Monther v. Lough — Entry #15: ORDER granting 14 Stipulated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss this action without prejudice
Case: Monther v. Lough utd · 2:18-cv-00791
filed October 10, 2018
What this document is
Docket entry #15 · filed January 28, 2021
ORDER granting 14 Stipulated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 1/28/21 (alt) (Entered: 01/28/2021)
Who is involved
- Denver Lough
- Edward Swanson
- Henry Monther
- Jeff Dyer
- John Stetson
- Jon Mogford
- Michael Beeghley
- Polarityte
- Steven Gorlin
- Willie C. Bogan
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its former name “Marathon Patent Group, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Chief Financial Officer, and Director of Marathon Patent Group, Inc. (MARA), a NASDAQ listed patent…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 08, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 2,472 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 2:18-cv-00791-TC Document 15 Filed 01/28/21 PageID.93 Page 1 of 2
Kenneth B. Black (05588)
ken.black@stoel.com
Michael R. Menssen (15424)
michael.menssen@stoel.com
STOEL RIVES LLP
201 S. Main Street, Suite 1100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Telephone: (801) 328-3131
Attorneys for Defendants PolarityTE, Inc.,
Denver Lough, Michael Beeghley, Willie C.
Bogan, Jeff Dyer, Steven Gorlin, Jon Mogford,
John Stetson and Edward Swanson
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH
HENRY MONTHER, derivatively on behalf ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
of POLARITYTE, INC., MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT
Plaintiff, TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 23.1 AND 41
v.
Case No. 2:18-cv-00791-TC
DENVER LOUGH, MICHAEL
BEEGHLEY, WILLIE C. BOGAN, JEFF Hon. Tena Campbell
DYER, STEVEN GORLIN, JON
MOGFORD, JOHN STETSON, and
EDWARD SWANSON,
Defendants,
and
POLARITYTE, INC.,
Nominal Defendant.
Case 2:18-cv-00791-TC Document 15 Filed 01/28/21 PageID.94 Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to the Stipulated Motion Regarding Voluntary Dismissal of Action Pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1(c) and 41(a) (the “Stipulated Motion”) (ECF No. 14), and
good cause appearing:
1. This Action shall be dismissed on the terms provided for in the Stipulated Motion,
without prejudice as to Plaintiff, Polarity, and/or any other Polarity stockholder.
2. Notice to Polarity stockholders of this dismissal beyond the public filing of this
Order is unnecessary because (i) the dismissal is without prejudice to the ability of any Polarity
stockholder, or Polarity itself, to pursue the claims asserted in the Action; and (ii) there has been
no settlement or compromise of the Action.
3. The Parties shall bear their own fees, costs, and expenses in connection with the
Action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 28, 2021
The Honorable Tena Campbell
United States District Court Judge
2