CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC. v. SELIG — Entry #42: Memorandum in opposition to re [41] MOTION for Discovery on Facts Related to Plaintiff's Standing filed by CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC

Case: CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC. v. SELIG dcd · 1:26-cv-02157

filed June 18, 2026

What this document is

Docket entry #42 · filed September 18, 2026

Memorandum in opposition to re [41] MOTION for Discovery on Facts Related to Plaintiff's Standing filed by CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.. (Attachments: (1) Exhibit Excerpted Administrative Record, (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Goelman, Aitan)

Who is involved

CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
HYPERLIQUID POLICY CENTER
MICHAEL S. SELIG

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

Marathon Digital: a spelling of its name “Marathon Digital Holdings” appears in a filing in this case.
…hedging programs in SEC filings:MarathonDigitalHoldings (now MARA Holdings) ran…
CleanSpark: its project “Washington” appears in a filing in this case.
…Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20581 Re: KalshiEX LLC – Commission…

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 06, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL: https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.293632/gov.uscourts.dcd.293632.42.2.pdf
Kind: court_filing
Publisher: RECAP
Published: 2026-09-18 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved: 2026-10-06 06:44:21.179673-04:00
HTTP status: 200
MIME: application/pdf
Bytes: 28145
SHA-256: a4f60538a3964b494fd8b2eb4e2af21b9cc1047e6e86fe7ff0a542a5be923b8b

Document text

1 page(s), 957 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text

Case 1:26-cv-02157-CKK           Document 42-2   Filed 09/18/26    Page 1 of 1


                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


 CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.,

                     Plaintiff,

                        –v.–                      Case No. 26-cv-2157

 MICHAEL S. SELIG, et al.,

                    Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE
           TO TAKE JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY
       Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Take Discovery, Plaintiff’s

Opposition, and any reply thereto, it is hereby

       ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is denied.

       SO ORDERED.


Dated: _____________                              _______________________________
                                                  The Honorable Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
                                                  United States District Judge