jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 12, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at the filing system ↗

Giganews, Inc. v. Perfect 10, Inc. — Entry #266: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court now issues its final judgment as follows: (1) Plaintiffs Giganews, Inc

Case: Giganews, Inc. v. Perfect 10, Inc. cacd · 2:17-cv-05075

filed July 10, 2017

What this document is

Docket entry #266 · filed September 23, 2019

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court now issues its final judgment as follows: (1) Plaintiffs Giganews, Inc. and Livewire Services, Inc. are entitled to judgment against both defendants Perfect 10, Inc., and Norman Zada, jointly and severally, on the plaintiffs' first cause of action for actual fraudulent transfer in the amount of $454,000.00 in compensatory damages and $746,000.00 in punitive damages. (2) Plaintiffs are further entitled to prejudgment interest from both defendants, jointly and severally, at seven percent per annum pursuant to Cal. Civil Code Section 3287(a) and Cal. Const. art. XV Section 1 on the compensatory damages ($454,000) from 5/13/2015, to the date the jury entered its verdict, 4/3/2019, for an additional amount of $123,712.26 ($87.06 per day for 1,421 days). (3) Plaintiffs are also entitled to prejudgment interest from both defendants, jointly and severally, on the entire award ($1,200,000.00, including compensatory and punitive damages) from the date of the verdict, 4/3/2019, to the date the Court enters this final judgment. This amounts to $230.13 per day for 174 days, totaling an additional $40,042.62. (4) Defendants are entitled to judgment on the plaintiffs' second and third causes of action for constructive fraudulent transfer and for transfer of property without transfer of possession. (5) The Court will address costs in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and Civ. L.R. 54-1. (6) Plaintiffs are also entitled to postjudgment interest from the date of this Judgment, at the prevailing federal rate. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) (Entered: 09/23/2019)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 12, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.683387/gov.uscourts.cacd.683387.266.0_1.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2019-09-23 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-11-12 06:51:35.357967-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
126380
SHA-256
8f95b1bc22dd8e1717219cc0e4220e70b88df9ce460769f8ed9f72fa39d29e09

Document text

2 page(s), 2,978 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
1
 2
 3
                                                                     JS-6
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 9                         CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10                                  LOS ANGELES DIVISION
11 GIGANEWS, INC., a Texas Corporation; Case No.: 2:17-cv-05075-AB (JPR)
   LIVEWIRE SERVICES, INC., a Nevada
12 Corporation,                         [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
13                    Plaintiffs,              Courtroom:   7B
                                               Judge:       Hon. André Birotte, Jr.
14        v.
15 PERFECT 10, INC., a California
   Corporation; NORMAN ZADA, in
16 individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
17                    Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

     FINAL JUDGMENT                                    CASE NO. 2:17-CV-05075-AB (JPR)


 1         On April 3, 2019, the jury entered a special verdict after trial. The Court now
 2 issues its final judgment as follows:
 3         1.     Plaintiffs Giganews, Inc. and Livewire Services, Inc. are entitled to
 4 judgment against both defendants Perfect 10, Inc., and Norman Zada, jointly and
 5 severally, on the plaintiffs’ first cause of action for actual fraudulent transfer in the
 6 amount of $454,000.00 in compensatory damages and $746,000.00 in punitive
 7 damages.
 8         2.     Plaintiffs are further entitled to prejudgment interest from both
 9 defendants, jointly and severally, at seven percent per annum pursuant to Cal. Civil
10 Code § 3287(a) and Cal. Const. art. XV § 1 on the compensatory damages
11 ($454,000) from May 13, 2015, to the date the jury entered its verdict, April 3,
12 2019, for an additional amount of $123,712.26 ($87.06 per day for 1,421 days).
13         3.     Plaintiffs are also entitled to prejudgment interest from both
14 defendants, jointly and severally, on the entire award ($1,200,000.00, including
15 compensatory and punitive damages) from the date of the verdict, April 3, 2019, to
16 the date the Court enters this final judgment. This amounts to $230.13 per day for
17 174 days, totaling an additional $40,042.62.
18         4.     Defendants are entitled to judgment on the plaintiffs’ second and third
19 causes of action for constructive fraudulent transfer and for transfer of property
20 without transfer of possession.
21         5.     The Court will address costs in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.
22 54(d)(1) and Civ. L.R. 54-1.
23         6.     Plaintiffs are also entitled to postjudgment interest from the date of this
24 Judgment, at the prevailing federal rate.
25         IT IS SO ORDERED:
26 Dated: September 23, 2019
                                           Hon. André Birotte, Jr.
27                                         United States District Judge
28                                         Central District of California

     FINAL JUDGMENT                              2            CASE NO. 2:17-CV-05075-AB (JPR)