Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc v. Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY LLC — Entry #13
Case: Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc v. Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY LLC txnd · 3:25-cv-02727
filed October 07, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #13 · filed March 13, 2026
Who is involved
- Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY LLC
- Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Hut 8: its name “Hut 8 Corp.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Assistant General Counsel - Real Estate at Hut 8 Corp., located at 1101 Brickell Ave, N-1500, Miami…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 12, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
4 page(s), 6,974 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 3:25-cv-02727-E Document 13 Filed 03/13/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID 121
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE §
RESTAURANTS, INC. §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-cv-02727-E
§
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE § JURY DEMANDED
RESTAURANT OF CNY, LLC, §
§
Defendant. §
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
Plaintiff, Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants, Inc. ("Spaghetti Warehouse" or "Plaintiff"),
seeks a default judgment against Defendant, Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY, LLC
("Defendant"), under Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Defendant has
failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action, despite being properly served Plaintiff's
Complaint for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief, Damages, and Other Relief (Doc. 1,
filed on October 7, 2025, and served on October 27, 2025, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4
(Doc. 8, filed on November 12, 2025). On December 5, 2025, the Clerk of the Court entered a
default against Defendant.
INTRODUCTION
1. Plaintiff filed this action asserting claims for trademark infringement under the
Lanham Act and Texas law, unfair competition, dilution, and breach of contract based on
Defendant's post-termination use of Plaintiff's licensed intellectual property and failure to
perform obligations under a written License Agreement. Defendant was provided with written
171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 1
Case 3:25-cv-02727-E Document 13 Filed 03/13/26 Page 2 of 4 PageID 122
notice of default and later written notice of termination of the License Agreement and cease and
desist but failed to cure. Defendant received notice of this Courts Default notice. Defendant
continues to use Plaintiff's marks and other licensed property without authorization.
2. Plaintiff respectfully requests entry of default judgment granting injunctive and
monetary relief consistent with the Complaint and the accompanying Motion for Default
Judgment and Brief in Support, the Appendix, Exhibits and evidence in support thereof.
LEGAL STANDARD FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
3. Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for the entry of default
judgment when a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to
plead or otherwise defend. Upon entry of default, the well-pleaded factual allegations of the
complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages, are taken as true.
4. Upon default, the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint except those relating
to damages are deemed admitted. Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Hous. Nat'l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200,
1206 (5th Cir. 1975).
5. The decision to enter a default judgment lies within the district court's discretion,
guided by whether (1) the default was willful; (2) the plaintiff would suffer prejudice absent
judgment; and (3) the defendant has no meritorious defense. Lindsey v. Prive Corp., 161 F.3d
886, 893 (5th Cir. 1998).
6. Plaintiff moves this court for entry of a default judgment against Defendant under
Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff requests that the judgment be
entered as further set forth in the attached proposed default judgment.
7. Defendant has not appeared in this action and is not entitled to notice of this
application for entry of a default judgment.
171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 2
Case 3:25-cv-02727-E Document 13 Filed 03/13/26 Page 3 of 4 PageID 123
8. Defendant's failure to respond warrants entry of default judgment for Plaintiff.
9. Plaintiff's claims are supported by the well-pleaded allegations in the Complaint,
which are deemed admitted upon default.
10. Plaintiff is prejudiced by Defendant's refusal to participate in the litigation, as
Plaintiff is unable to obtain relief absent a judgment.
11. There is no indication that Defendant possesses any meritorious defenses.
12. Accordingly, a default judgment is warranted. See United States v. Shipco Gen.,
Inc., 814 F.2d 1011, 1014 (5th Cir. 1987) (default judgment appropriate where defendant fails to
defend and plaintiff's claims are supported).
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court
grant this Motion for Default Judgment and enter judgment against Defendant for the relief
requested herein, including economic and compensatory damages subject to adjustment based on
Defendant's sworn accounting, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, costs of court, a hearing
to determine the amount of exemplary damages, and such other and further relief as the Court
may deem just and proper.
DATED: March 13, 2026.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
By:___ __________________________
Casey S. Erick
TX State Bar No. 24028564
Kyndall E. Richardson
TX State Bar No. 24149343
2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2000
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: (214) 722-7107
Fax: (214) 722-7111
[email protected]
[email protected]
171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 3
Case 3:25-cv-02727-E Document 13 Filed 03/13/26 Page 4 of 4 PageID 124
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned does hereby certify that on the 13th day of March 2026, the foregoing
document was served electronically with a copy of the pleading through use of the Court's
CM/ECF system and/or mailing it to the last known address of counsel and or parties, if any.
_____________________________
CASEY S. ERICK
171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 4
