jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 12, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc v. Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY LLC — Entry #13

Case: Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc v. Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY LLC txnd · 3:25-cv-02727

filed October 07, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #13 · filed March 13, 2026

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 12, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.410141/gov.uscourts.txnd.410141.13.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2026-03-13 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-10-12 06:43:35.192989-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
57077
SHA-256
8f7b41cd36373165c6f9b1dd713689a842e187710ca17d15f76bedb5b02f545e

Document text

4 page(s), 6,974 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 3:25-cv-02727-E         Document 13      Filed 03/13/26      Page 1 of 4     PageID 121


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                   DALLAS DIVISION

SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE                  §
RESTAURANTS, INC.                    §
                                     §
       Plaintiff,                    §
                                     §
v.                                   §      CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-cv-02727-E
                                     §
SPAGHETTI WAREHOUSE                  §      JURY DEMANDED
RESTAURANT OF CNY, LLC,              §
                                     §
       Defendant.                    §

                    PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

       Plaintiff, Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants, Inc. ("Spaghetti Warehouse" or "Plaintiff"),

seeks a default judgment against Defendant, Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY, LLC

("Defendant"), under Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Defendant has

failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action, despite being properly served Plaintiff's

Complaint for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief, Damages, and Other Relief (Doc. 1,

filed on October 7, 2025, and served on October 27, 2025, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4

(Doc. 8, filed on November 12, 2025). On December 5, 2025, the Clerk of the Court entered a

default against Defendant.

                                      INTRODUCTION

       1.      Plaintiff filed this action asserting claims for trademark infringement under the

Lanham Act and Texas law, unfair competition, dilution, and breach of contract based on

Defendant's post-termination use of Plaintiff's licensed intellectual property and failure to

perform obligations under a written License Agreement. Defendant was provided with written


171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 1


Case 3:25-cv-02727-E         Document 13        Filed 03/13/26       Page 2 of 4      PageID 122


notice of default and later written notice of termination of the License Agreement and cease and

desist but failed to cure. Defendant received notice of this Courts Default notice. Defendant

continues to use Plaintiff's marks and other licensed property without authorization.

       2.      Plaintiff respectfully requests entry of default judgment granting injunctive and

monetary relief consistent with the Complaint and the accompanying Motion for Default

Judgment and Brief in Support, the Appendix, Exhibits and evidence in support thereof.

                    LEGAL STANDARD FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

       3.      Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for the entry of default

judgment when a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to

plead or otherwise defend. Upon entry of default, the well-pleaded factual allegations of the

complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages, are taken as true.

       4.      Upon default, the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint except those relating

to damages are deemed admitted. Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Hous. Nat'l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200,

1206 (5th Cir. 1975).

       5.      The decision to enter a default judgment lies within the district court's discretion,

guided by whether (1) the default was willful; (2) the plaintiff would suffer prejudice absent

judgment; and (3) the defendant has no meritorious defense. Lindsey v. Prive Corp., 161 F.3d

886, 893 (5th Cir. 1998).

       6.      Plaintiff moves this court for entry of a default judgment against Defendant under

Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff requests that the judgment be

entered as further set forth in the attached proposed default judgment.

       7.      Defendant has not appeared in this action and is not entitled to notice of this

application for entry of a default judgment.


171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 2


Case 3:25-cv-02727-E         Document 13        Filed 03/13/26     Page 3 of 4      PageID 123


       8.      Defendant's failure to respond warrants entry of default judgment for Plaintiff.

       9.      Plaintiff's claims are supported by the well-pleaded allegations in the Complaint,

which are deemed admitted upon default.

       10.     Plaintiff is prejudiced by Defendant's refusal to participate in the litigation, as

Plaintiff is unable to obtain relief absent a judgment.

       11.     There is no indication that Defendant possesses any meritorious defenses.

       12.     Accordingly, a default judgment is warranted. See United States v. Shipco Gen.,

Inc., 814 F.2d 1011, 1014 (5th Cir. 1987) (default judgment appropriate where defendant fails to

defend and plaintiff's claims are supported).


                                         CONCLUSION

        WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court
grant this Motion for Default Judgment and enter judgment against Defendant for the relief
requested herein, including economic and compensatory damages subject to adjustment based on
Defendant's sworn accounting, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, costs of court, a hearing
to determine the amount of exemplary damages, and such other and further relief as the Court
may deem just and proper.

DATED: March 13, 2026.
                                       LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP


                                       By:___ __________________________
                                         Casey S. Erick
                                         TX State Bar No. 24028564
                                         Kyndall E. Richardson
                                         TX State Bar No. 24149343
                                         2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2000
                                         Dallas, Texas 75201
                                         Telephone: (214) 722-7107
                                         Fax: (214) 722-7111
                                         [email protected]
                                         [email protected]


171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 3


Case 3:25-cv-02727-E       Document 13      Filed 03/13/26     Page 4 of 4     PageID 124


                              CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

      The undersigned does hereby certify that on the 13th day of March 2026, the foregoing
document was served electronically with a copy of the pleading through use of the Court's
CM/ECF system and/or mailing it to the last known address of counsel and or parties, if any.


                                           _____________________________
                                           CASEY S. ERICK


171935229.1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 4