jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 10, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. v. TikTok Inc. — Entry #120: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando L

Case: Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. v. TikTok Inc. cacd · 2:24-cv-04837

filed June 07, 2024

What this document is

Docket entry #120 · filed May 22, 2026

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On May 21, 2026, Plaintiff Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. and Defendant TikTok Inc. filed a stipulation to stay all deadlines for sixty days, stating the parties had reached an agreement in principle to resolve all of the claims at issue in this case and anticipated filing a stipulation to dismiss the action. 119 . Having considered the Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, the court hereby ORDERS: 1. All deadlines governing this action are VACATED. 2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, provided any request by a party to do so shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 60-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party making such a request reasonably expects the process to be concluded. 3. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require approval of the court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) (Entered: 05/22/2026)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 10, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cacd.929069/gov.uscourts.cacd.929069.120.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2026-05-22 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-11-10 06:47:38.491927-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
137574
SHA-256
8355894d2c23bde6b79bba5f06a9d0d2a94fc657d6ff15a17cff8d088afb5637

Document text

2 page(s), 2,819 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 2:24-cv-04837-FLA-MAR     Document 120   Filed 05/22/26   Page 1 of 2 Page ID
                                     #:4159


1                                                                       JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9                      CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11   MICHAEL GRECCO                           Case No. 2:24-cv-04837-FLA (MARx)
     PRODUCTIONS INC.,
12
                             Plaintiff,       ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
13                                            [DKT. 119]
               v.
14
15   TIKTOK, INC.,
16                           Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


Case 2:24-cv-04837-FLA-MAR        Document 120      Filed 05/22/26   Page 2 of 2 Page ID
                                        #:4160


1          On May 21, 2026, Plaintiff Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. and Defendant
2    TikTok Inc. filed a stipulation (“Stipulation”) to stay all deadlines for sixty days,
3    stating the parties had reached an agreement in principle to resolve all of the claims at
4    issue in this case and anticipated filing a stipulation to dismiss the action. Dkt. 119 at
5    2.
6          Having considered the Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, the court
7    hereby ORDERS:
8            1.   All deadlines governing this action are VACATED.
9            2.   The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains
10                jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within sixty (60)
11                days from the date of this Order, provided any request by a party to do so
12                shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not
13                been completed within the 60-day period, what further settlement
14                processes are necessary, and when the party making such a request
15                reasonably expects the process to be concluded.
16           3.   This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with
17                prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require approval
18                of the court. Such stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned
19                60-day period, or by such later date ordered by the court pursuant to a
20                stipulation by the parties that conforms to the requirements of a showing
21                of good cause stated above.
22
23         IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25   Dated: May 22, 2026
26                                                  _______________________________
                                                    FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
27                                                  United States District Judge
28

                                                2