WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE — Entry #33: MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER
Case: WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE dcd · 1:05-cv-01483
filed July 28, 2005
What this document is
Docket entry #33 · filed June 21, 2007
MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER (Attachments: # (1) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment# (2) Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Grace Huebscher and Deposition Excerpts# (3) Exhibit Exhibit B - 3-28-2007 Williams Dep and Exhibit# (4) Exhibit Exhibit C - Fannie Mae's Interrogatory Responses# (5) Exhibit Exhibit D - Declaration of Richard Lawch# (6) Exhibit Exhibit E - 3-21-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (7) Exhibit Exhibit F - 5-7-2007 Williams Deposition and Exhibit# (8) Exhibit Exhibit G - DC Certificate# (9) Exhibit Exhibit H - Jones Deposition and Exhibits# (10) Exhibit Exhibit I - CAM Amended Complaint# (11) Exhibit Exhibit J - CAM Dismissal Order# (12) Exhibit Exhibit K - Williams Interrogatory Responses# (13) Exhibit Exhibit L - 3-17-2003 Williams Deposition# (14) Exhibit Exhibit M - DC License Document# (15) Exhibit Exhibit N - Draft Complaint# (16) Exhibit Exhibit O - 5-5-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (17) Exhibit Exhibit P - 5-6-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (18) Exhibit Exhibit Q - Westover Declaration# (19) Exhibit Exhibit R - Production Document# (20) Exhibit Exhibit S - Ott Deposition Excerpts# (21) Exhibit Exhibit T - Production Document# (22) Affidavit Declaration of K Grundeman# (23) Statement of Facts Statement of Undisputed Facts# (24) Text of Proposed Order # (25) Certificate of Service)(Goldfrank, Sarah)
Who is involved
- FANNIE MAE
- WILLIAMS
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its subsidiary “Sullivan Company” appears in a filing in this case.
…recruited away by another firm known as John 19 F. Sullivan Company in Philadelphia, 20 Pennsylvania. 21 Q.…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 07, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
17 page(s), 20,470 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 17
EXHIBIT Q
Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document33-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARIALICE BATHRUS WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 1:05CV01483
VS.
Judge John D. Bates
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION, et al. |
DECLARATION OF KATHRYN
Defendants. WESTOVER
I, Kathryn “Kate” Westover, hereby declare as follows:
1, I am not a party to the above-captioned action. I am over eighteen years of age,
and the statements made herein are based on my personal knowledge. I refreshed my
recollection through the review of the documents attached hereto at Tab A.
2. In or about August 2001, plaintiff Marialice Williams and I had a meeting with
representatives from Fannie Mae’s Multifamily Division to discuss the possible use of captive
insurance companies by Fannie Mae. I do not remember any additional meetings with
representatives from Fannie Mae on this or any other subject, although there may have been a
telephone phone conference call before or after the meeting on this subject.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
(DATE) at Colchester, Vermont.
3f/e7 fikr A Se lovee
Kathryn Westover
Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document 33-19 Filed G6/21/2007 Page dof?
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Documentac-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4oafi7
/ Animemaindceeneon con ; Q ot a . a : - | 7 ~ kaye! _ ; t
etn "Subject: J A few w questions 2 and an update from RMS, Co a
pe "Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:16:10-0400 oe five
we “From: "Marialice Williams" <marlalice@worldnet. attnet> - | ; 7 |
a - To: <thoda:s_newman@fanniemae.com>, <grace._ uebscher@fanniemae. coms bE" shat pmo,
7 é 7 CG <bhartsfield@risk-intgation com> . 4 A
i: Update fom RMS a
‘First the good news--we have the interest af three i insurance companies, two ‘of whom are domestic Alle are erated At and above.
‘ However, Wwe need | to ‘know a conple of things to facilitate c our discussions with them:
7 4, is there 2 any. interest on Fannie: Mae's part in insuring her portion of the 5-20% mezzanine level of risk on the DUS Spot? a
oe (This ¢ could fead toa lower premium for the lenders). . . ’
en 2. Does Fannie Mae have: any ny objection to the DUS lenders slaying off all or past of thee first.loss 5 obligation on the DUS joans to a- .
ae "AA" or better rated credit enhancer? ©
4, Is is there any j possibilty of obtaining data from Fannie Mae regarding the underwriting and performance of the DUS portfolio?
’ The Keen interest is in what percentage of the mortgage loans originated meet the various.tiers of the DUS program and has there
: been a distinction in the’ performance based upon those tiers of Loans? .
' Sorry that we were unable to get Kate Westover i in to see you in June, We only need about. and hour. and a half. Isthereatimein
July th that will work? Also, if yous find that there is room because of a cancellation | in June we would te happy to Bilin. SS
. We. don't need all of ‘the answers to our questions. at one time. As soon as you have some idea about each question, tet us know.
Thanks, Marialice ,
wine DUS portivi”
Hanrand Be ire
‘oh —_ ; | - Fe | _ — 10496 ‘53/01 9:53 AN.
FNMA.MBW.008031
CONFIDENTIAL
a
‘ wo
ot ot
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19 Filed 06/21/2007, Page 5 of 17
to
“> plvd: Captive Insurance, Cosnpany Update}
» Siibjects [Fra Captive Insurance Companty Update],
_Daté: Wed,-06 Jun 2001 12:21:05-0500
iE rom: Bob Jones <bobjones@cam-fi nancial.com>
Tor Awgroves@bellsouth net, chockrumsey eam financial. com
: Bob. Jones weoke:"
1 ‘advised’ ‘Marialice to copy both Red ‘capital and Lend Lease on ‘this. :
‘“ .message to Richard and Grace, . just as if she never saw the Fannie. Mae.
email. régarding Craig: Ott.
“This reversal by IRS now offers Fannie Mae and/or each bUS Lender to ,
.. > form their’ own captive under the same "economic family” for balance:
sheet ‘treatment: with the captive first loss premium now’ tax deductible, ao .
“The IRS ruling also acknowledges. the shift of captive first loss from
-* the the policy holder to the. insurer for risk transfer. Our copyrigtited ;
“MCRI policy is acceptable for risk transfer and. could be used by AIG, ©
oe Gen Star. or Zurich to front the: captive. coverage.
oc
7 “Subject: Captive h Insirance Conipany Upaate
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:13:44 -0400 -
From: "Marialice Williams” <marialice@worldnet att. net>
To: <prace_ huebscher@fanniemae. com>, <richard_s. _laweh@fanniemae.c com>
_- CC: <mebeisler@redcapitalgroup.com>, <jklarson@lendleaserei. comp,
| <rhoda_ e _newman@fanniemae. com>, > <bhartsfield@risk-mitigation. com> |
. On June 4, 2001, the IRS issued 3 ‘ling that has the i insurance world reeling. The Jong standing pe position that premiuins 0s paid to
captives are e not deductible under + the So-called." economic family” theory has been reversed.
- The IRS, in 1977, took the f position that "in the case of related- -party risks, if such. risks are insured of reinsuréd by arelated
_ insurance cosnmpany—one in the same ‘economic family, ‘the premiums involved cannot be deducted from federal taxes because risk --
'. :has not shifted from the. policyholder to, the insurer."
: "Accordingly, the IRS will no longer invoke the economic family theory with respect to captive insurance transactions. ”
‘After this new ruling, iti is clear that the captive! is an ideal way to Jay off the first loss obligation of assetholders entering into ©
_*: secondary market transactions. This ruling can-enable Fannie Mae to set UP its own credit enhancement facility. Andi in light of
Fannié ¢ Mae’ s credit, the capitalization costs would be minimal. =~ .
The DUS lenders could set up such a fond with their DUS reserve accounts and obtain substantial economic benefit as well a as”
reducing I Fannié Mae's exposure to the risk associated with this portfolio, That's because any policy issued by a DUS lender's
lof2-
captive insurance compariy: would be wrapped or fronted bya rated remsurer.
oy My associate and I serve on the Captive Advisory Committee for the District of Columbia's Depariment of Insurance and Securities
_ Regulation. Our new law was pattemed after the Vermont statute which is considered the best domestic jurisdiction in which to
_ form a captive: Just one. captive has applied for and been approved | to operated i in D.C. This could have all kinds of positive -
- ramifications for Fannie Mae. . .
re a
_ Our associate, Kate Westover, i in Vermont, is assisting us with our customers. She will be consulting with Larry Mirrel,
the Commissioner for. DISR on 1 June 14 while you guys at F annie Mae will be out of town, We had hope to bring. her by.
7 Meanwhile, my aisociate, Harvey } Hartsfield continues to work with Rhoda on a time ‘for Kate. to make a presentation to Fannie
‘Mae. 7
10514 6/6/01 12:33 PM |
FENMA.MBW. 008054
CONFIDENTIAL
Case 1 O5-Cv-01483-JD8 _ Document 33-19 Filed 06/21/2007 . Page 6 Oba7
*ppoude Captive Insurance Company Update] © = 2
Ry: Feél free to call if you have questions. . Marialice uo
i
2of2 © _ oO | . oe 7 oo a 10515 6/6/01 12:31 PM
FNMA.MBW.008052
CONFIDENTIAL
Case 1:05-ov-01483-JD8 Document 3o-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 7 of 17
* apiive ins unis : 7 7 7
ae | Subject: Captive Tasurance Companies.
7 Se a) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:29:30 -0400 ©
UL Byoim: "Risk-Mit" <marialice@risk-mitigation.com>._ —
“Tor <dgoodman@redcapitalgroup. com>, incbeisler@redcapitalgroup. com> : :
OG ‘<bhartsfield@risk-mitigation.c com>, "Bob I ones” <bobjones@cam-fnancal com> -
my “ Harvey and Is saw ‘the quoies ‘from Davidi in an attidle in ithe Multi-Housing ‘News for June 2001. Giad tos see that you guys a are - mo
i. ‘anticipating another successful year in refinancing apartment b bullding mortgages. ee _
a We just ‘wanted to reinind you that 0 our captive insuranite company concept has just been given 2 boost by the new ‘Revenue Ruling
| from IRS: Our associate, Kate Westover gave an excellent: Presentation at at the Department of Ir Insurance and. Securities Regulation
_ last week, Several off our clients were in attendance. :
“* Rate was able to confirm for Larry, Mire, the head of DISR that the new Reyeme Raiting by the IRS, 2001 31, provides for the’
-. deductibility of premiums paid to captive insurance comipanies by captive insurance company owners. And further bolsters the .
-. ° ‘concept, that captive insurance companies, owned by a related company or parent, are true insurance companies, Therefore, oncéa
- _ captive issues a policy to cover the risk ona portfolio of assets there is a true risk transfer from the related or parent company to
: ‘the captive. Therefore, our clients who are concemed about risk-based capital i issués can now form a captive insurance company,
: "transfer the risk of Joss of their loan n portfolio to the- captive. insurancé - company and get t the accounting and balance sheet relief that ,
_— they need. © a . s . _
_ And, if used j in connection with securitization, the captive insurance company policy is the credit enhancement necessary to . .
eliminate the need to ISSUE SUBORDINATE SECURITIES.
Also, D. C. has approved the first captive insurance ¢ company wy under the new D. C. captive insurancé law. We are on the captive
_ _| “advisory committee for D.C, and are more committed than ever to bringing this innovative risk transfer concept to our customers.
- - We are happy to be able to provide this innovative tool to our F customers ona local basis. ‘The off-shore jurisdictions have.
dominated this busiriess for the past 30 years. - .
oo Let'us know if you would like to see the documentation on the revenue e ruling or want to disess the use of the captive insurance as
“18 Fisk-transfer credit enhancement facility i in your day to day operations, , noah ite are
- - Marialice Williams
were “Riki dhobe, shes 4
) ES RHE Gombiate d
cE WO OUP CuSstorhgiy
* ibe WES
bof} 10519 6/18/01 4:45 PM,
FNMA.MBW.008054 -
CONFIDENTIAL
ete
Case 1:05-cv-01480-JD8 Document 3o-19 Filed OG/e1/2007 Page of 17
oP eeONU Ue reese ta.
a . * oe ‘iT :
ee
~ Subj j ect: Presentation on + August aa
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:49:18 0400. ‘
“From: "mail risk-mitigation.com" “marialioe@ristomitigation com>
-. To: "Rhoda E Newman” <thoda: e _hewman@fanniemae, com>,
<grace_ huebscher@fanniemae. com>...
CC: <bhartsfi fe lO@aiskemmitigation.com> :
| Sy We’ are’ looking fo forward to inectirig with you of Athe 21st of ‘August ‘However, we want to make certain that Kate ison
'. ! “4arget-with her presentation. Gould you please let us. know if you are looking at the captive as a potential 6 credit
os “enhancement tool for Fannie Mae or. as a tool that the DUS lenders could use.
fr
~ J met with LendLease’ Chief Crédit Officer and the CFOi in Dallas last week. There. appears {fo be ir interest on their
-.” part in using a captive insurance company as a risk transfer and credit enhancement vehicle but they were -
. = concerned about Fannie Mae's reaction to the concept of captive. insurance companies. . Also, it appeared to
“ LendLease that the captive could be-very effective if they could also lay off their 5% first loss obligation under the .
, DUS program to the captive i insurance company. This, question was 5 raised i in my: e-ail to you back on: May 30.
tof!
, : Finally. could we spend a little time discussing the other iwo questions from the insurance companies that we 2 posed .
to you at the end of May? .
i My partner, Harvey Harsh eld will be working with Kate on her presentation sO pleat s@ 6C him. on your response.
. Thanks. Marialice _
wea sib Uner the
oo on May oo
ene 2
Bp lita ae peer
10522 seo 12:00 PM
FNMA.MBW.008057
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 9 of 17
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Bocument 33-19
Filed 06/27/2007
Bega
4 " :o *
aingiisig: saat og - Kampsredoig PUP Jottuapyys Wor)
a WHOS TYSON To NO saa WARTS,
_— ~ ee mn, . ; _Saryned ‘naysenaniq siq) wt UO TULeyeE Auposouasy wopeu 20juy 2 low 10g
ag poanitoag
pe NOLLATOS BALLEVO GL
t :Ag ques
‘ZEOE BEE 20 |
tHdSS:2
z ebeg:
ENMA.MBW.008060
19-82 -Bny
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 10 af 17
riled 06/21/2007
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JD8 Document 33-19
-s 6tS0R
7 .
ee
; Bop eran
: ano
ns : - . . = oo “papain, 10 9 unoape Buayavepin poebelbes Auese4 eney feu (spaunsuy Ss} fa paiumo 104) enydieo paiosuods v : <
| | ; | | ““dysieuno ou ing seunp pue sub Buyney yendeo
“angen 10 Jewel 40 juedpaied e ‘8g few 1 yeumo owed e eq 40 omded on uMmo Aeus pansy poyearsiydos ay bh
7 - _ ualhsul peyuupe-tow e WOY souemsi eseypind pug
no : | - . : ; Lo ySHI 10 suunotue jue rere a aunce oui sey UOItn edueinsul jo sehng jejoveutu09 e sl paunaul peyeaysiydos By <
| | | “wiaisks ojeinbai AOUBINSUt retovacuuoa |
eu 40 spisino .Speinsuy paieonsndo, jo Ss aun yo aouesisure! 10 @oueunsu ay 8} asoditid Areutid s aaydes ay L «
_Reoideee eB 10. ‘enna B “fuedios sors @ 88 uieo ~ ~ vedio souenst esodind ejpeds ¥ «
sop doy 8 geandege syjeyyy |
7Ag ues .
t
.
-£EOe BEE cOc
“Wd9S:Z
e ebeg
- 10-92- Bry
FNMA.MBW.008061
CONFIDENTIAL
Page Tioahi7 —
Filed 06/21/2007 —
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19
- OESOF
“pe uM
sn faiofew © an ‘000 £ sano ie payeuse are uojeredo iueuno uy | Sangdeo ing ejgequun are sonsnens opm PUOM
- . “syeuin) se eouesnisu) eandies seziuBoo91 mou OIVN aun Aysnpul entide e usiigeise ° Sun ae SeqR\S snosauwnyy
“uenieH, fq pamortoy ‘painsuy sn 10}. Syojuiop alcysuo Buipes; ou owinaaq qUOULaA ' s0g6t au ur
—_ *sajpuwop ardusyo ul senyiteo ysoui 404 sabejueape xe] pereuiuye uoje(si6o) uoweiodion ub, 10} patio mod
7 : . Z a “, =. 7 "suitteg pueio, ha Pamonoy speznsuy 'g n 404 efonuop Bx0USHO Supe, ou. susesen epnuniog, ‘so i pile s0961 an uy
7 - aS . . _ | ’ 7 eueouy H Bunusepuin
Pov fe tion bee . “soos Aveo au in om uy pewoy Buraq
- no we Poe “seins ‘senbuyoo} aay ietno veut 16604 sdeyied peasn u22q sey = Wsquitypous uy ues souesmayy andes |
7 . . Z - . ua 7 7 . _ “tiopeznunas xsi (Kqusces you) pue @OUBINSUT i188 peyljenb "s9]aqeonpop pe) iy. ‘serpy. payer ftenioadsonas
oF : . : : os se’ ons sveiBoud d Buypuny 84 BAIEWIO YE: Bupoye - a - asuodse: e s| yewew . LUV, 10 sajsues it 84 @ANeU sayy ay "
“auinsse QO} Buy St 1 Kueditos squeinsuy ou ey sys aney Kew Aaay} 10-
ne be moe 7 | ‘ontnaya 3800 3 jou feu fuedwsoo soueinsy fepvounwca B ™ ys 494) Jo ie 10 sejsuey ‘Spaunsuy pereonsidos 40.4
Meg A te Seandeg Jo Aojsiy aug
- “| safes dep,
Aa A A Aa A
{72108 BEE zOz
t0-Be~Sny
+ SWdBS22
y-26eg
FNMA.MBW.008062
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 120817
Filed 06/21/2007 _
| Case 10S-cv-01483-JD8 © Document 33-19
“eBesence pue suey ‘bp s 880] 1BA0 JORucd - sn09} WweweSovew yeu panaichiy “p
a - 7 . ne oo ° | : ; . oct vopustes g anydes ou} exoge pug. ingyen (Hog 48 fo sejsuen jo S00 UY uoronpey ‘S
: : . ? : : e; a . ‘ ; ws oe 7 m8H Buu y uy Ayaeyeoun sonpas a1 paunstij ue e $0 infige eu enoidu o} Buxjuncoce eoueitisu jo esn z
7 : : oe , a ; are ‘sumioid stanonpap io > SOUEINSU 1 398 ued JeUUEW onmnaye 3860 evolu e ul su. pauneat Surouey 40) werveoewy Vv Le
SM ie owes éSFALdvo 3SN OL SNNLLNOD S.GSYNSNI OG AHM.
:AG 29S
£7108 BEE 202
Lo-92-Sny
ind9Siz2
— S abeg
FNMA.MBW.008063
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 13 af 17
rilect 06/21/2007 |
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19
a 7 Sona | “fom 108 adoos s “eIep 880, # Aniseene uodn Supuodep ‘aro 40 utious : .
Phage Da Wb ek - | 3 wvieowd aALdvo V ONILNAW2 GMI
, Do darhgn
“Nouvonaav: BHD ONT waLdv yaa 5 OL +. aasyaoit amivnsh SI aAWLaWO v
SLNAWZSHOV LnvatoLieve NSIS 40 SSYVHS anssi a
_-Byeon e~
80m | a _NOLLYHOEYOONT YO IW ‘6
_"soudinsute 0 5 Bd pte seBerasc0 isodn Bupuedep alow 40 sian a NOLWINAWINDON | ONLLIUMMSONN g
_(iedioo wuewisteiiew 10 Aawioye oroquiop fq auop eq AeW) yea, 1 Ont ONY NOLLWuV date NOLVOMddy
"akin e- mie ‘peanbau Ti - ‘SuRaIAOUd BOINUES | 0 NOLLOSTaS ‘amotWod OL LISIA °
“patnbat nate os iesoidie pieog s2ureUN ka pouijuuiayep uy LL
]
NWIe ssanisng 40. WAOMdaY ‘g
“MOIAAL Jepjoyarsys pue- uopeveded 403 sider ez mony _ p
| NOWVavdTud NWid SSSNISNg °
"susie jurdsqied 10 smerAg' ssjorne auedand | SA0ge z LRM weutot0o a ; NOLNANNSOR ALWUOAYOD €.
“suowieynbor eolieunsue pue Bun.toa Uodn Bupuedep 8594 £0 uo, t
. ; Rants alniaisvas +
“RMU GaaWALSa | 2 lee noe Ce Sg
| WHaLvTIOD NOMONY NOULWZMWLIeW9 ‘SiNNOOoV MNVE Nido ' bb
ee » SNOLLMOSSa ONDINVE SSV¥d ‘SUBOtIIO 19373 Ol ONS TWNOLLWZINYSuO aioH ‘01
-ONRuNLONLS NYHOOUe ae
'
' sAg ques -
£7108 GEE zor
10-92 -5ny
“LwdZg:z.
6/9 ebeg
MBW.008064
ENTIAL
FNMA.
CONFID
Page 14 of 17
Filed 06/21/2007
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19
ae so _ sexe) dando —
meee a HEYA
= . = fe _ epoyores
“res
res / seydms pue Sontasoy
. pue oyroads 1Op |
omens |
| POPS»
|. vonnng eBay ;
» Azenioyipny ;
2 TRIDHOD
‘ :Ag .ues
sUnupy
8 Old
a ee ee
ae a soxe yt ]UdIy]
f- surssaoxg
$29 wos sure}o yy.
5 ieee safe mono
ee | _Aumedinog qwo4y
= spp me 1 t 7
1, anda
a. UMuuierg soaig Ande “y
_Pamnsuy
"2308 BEE 202 |
sieassy sande,
| ino :
to-ez-Sny
| ‘SUOISSTUNWOS sure :
WaOU
“ap0) uunfutas SsO1t PUTO 7
*HidZS:2
6/L abeg
FNMA.MBW.008065
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 15 of 17
Filed 06/21/2007
Case 1 5-Cv-O4 463-JDE Rocument 33-19
dae oL.
a © a - 7 _ : Saxe) angio . ~ | So
ree fe oa py
ie or #8 TerOUOH
Fg VNWI
Seen
| | SARS. |
os -gourenssy puog.
ff seaneauag .
Sy yeydes —
ee 1, - shunoooy "nde
K \ _ ose S ~ _ - syuMOs0Y
+> O\ Pes rezareyog”
-pasnsuy yore 10J tae) pnts
_AALLEW O-
BALLEVO .,
" stopfoyareys oande, 10°
z= (a0) amaoig ssoap, 2
SINY d] OULU CRINSNI aa
- SUOISSTUNOD sUTE}OY
108, nob “SANNA 40 MOTE NOILVZILRINOS SRI
at
TR ta
ah
! :hg les |
{4408 Bee Z02
Lo-82-Bny
*MdZG:Z
6/8 abeg
FNMA.MBW.008066
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 16 0f 17
Filed 06/21/2007
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB — Document 33-19
sie | BoHgadO ONO! . ANOWUSIA:
on ig Pe @BYOsNogs”
we
.
Pn be a | epntuueg ul peuoyde
oe . Lo : aooe
~ 900'SS
en ie Se
2 BYNd
ade oa,
PauiNba. UoneoyyEo exlesau Jeujsyy pUe ved ssauisng Jo adoos Aq paurpuiaieg
JuOUlla/ 10) Pauinber ‘sioyenGar ‘sleptAoid AKAs YAM JBdLU 0} BLOILUOD O} SHSIA,
eo. gopig.’
20p'deatyn
-- “uspjoumeys JO uone09; pue sOujoow PIO 205 BuyjoAedy suosiad jo raguinti vo quapusdag “IA
anjanys weiBold pue sysfjeue SSO} JOUOUM pur
eS Q0O'SS LaUTUNLU untied Jo juaoted e st xe} Lund
Saowies Sulunosoe 0 adooe Aq paused YA
LA YEU) a]0U ' BojoYs eyoILUOP Aq paulituajad -*1A
olssajaud pur ain feyenjae yo unowe Aq peuluueap Oq [WM S}SOO fBUOIppY +
. | ‘SBION:
mon, - Q | -efeya BuyoBu0 pajrupes 10)
: _ Bugjasyy B0}D0N1Q 10 PIBOR ‘tin
cp , 8B72UD [BHdegwey Auditing juewebeueyy ‘WA
| XBL Auedwodae} esusay jenuuy ‘10.
Gd (a
|) a, SeBuryp uonemuos peyeuinse (OL
| ae suneew pue jeaws) A)
— O000ES ueid ssalisng 10 uoneayidde sof Apnys Awiqiseay +)
- YORWYRE - | -
Bund”
SS” SS RORBETET Cy
a a - “ (xe) jesapo}: pue Buypuey swer ‘souemnsuret jf \s00 Burpryaxe ‘sayetugse eaijenesuog)
ae idcles we mee ec, Ub MBL JO UoRpAIEs Aq pauliuateg “1.
* . Uoeoydde 10} 99; Metne! 40 ‘jeqdes aueys yo junowe uodn peseq eq Aew
ess 7 aoinpe Bugunesse pue rebs| ‘xe} peu ;
7 feueny pur ypny a
:A@ JUeS
t
‘708 BEE 202
‘t0-e2-5ny
“HILS 2
6/6 abeg
067
MA.MBW.008
GONFIDENTIAL
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JD2 Document 30-19 Filed 06/21/2007 — Page 17 of 17
” Washingdsi Muna Transaition ~
"Subjects ‘Washington Mutual Transaction: “
.. Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:45:56 -0500 =
From: Bob Jones <bobjones(@cant financial cori en ee
Bo: marialice@risk-mitigation. com, dwgroves@bellsonth nt bobjones@ean-fin nancial com. |
Bob’ Jones wrote: 7 o Roars Seg eget ae a Wo ie
Mardalice,; Karl ‘returned my cali.’ No.. insurance. . Fannie Mae required. a.. = ;
_ spread account that accrues ( no front end $ ) to” 50 bpts. plus first: . mo eT, em!
‘loss recourse of some number -(confidential) south of: 4%.-: Fannie Mae's” 0 te
initial recourse level was 6%.- _. The portfolio has 12 year- weighted
_ average seasoning: Fannie. Mae ‘wouldn't. ‘disclose. its CPR, ‘but. Karl used
a CPR of 4%. He was very happy with this deal. :
: He also told’ me the average. ‘recourse on a Fannie Mae ‘pis portfolio. swap’
“; ranges from 9 to 428. Real’ interesting.“ I hope, this information is -
- . helpful. ; mae ee es - =
Good luck: on the, captive presentation with Kate and. Fannie Mae next
_ week. - ; a oe! .
ae CORTE
. 40537 |. :
tof) | 8/16/01 9:49 AM
CONFIDENTIAL
