jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 07, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE — Entry #33: MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER

Case: WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE dcd · 1:05-cv-01483

filed July 28, 2005

What this document is

Docket entry #33 · filed June 21, 2007

MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER (Attachments: # (1) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment# (2) Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Grace Huebscher and Deposition Excerpts# (3) Exhibit Exhibit B - 3-28-2007 Williams Dep and Exhibit# (4) Exhibit Exhibit C - Fannie Mae's Interrogatory Responses# (5) Exhibit Exhibit D - Declaration of Richard Lawch# (6) Exhibit Exhibit E - 3-21-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (7) Exhibit Exhibit F - 5-7-2007 Williams Deposition and Exhibit# (8) Exhibit Exhibit G - DC Certificate# (9) Exhibit Exhibit H - Jones Deposition and Exhibits# (10) Exhibit Exhibit I - CAM Amended Complaint# (11) Exhibit Exhibit J - CAM Dismissal Order# (12) Exhibit Exhibit K - Williams Interrogatory Responses# (13) Exhibit Exhibit L - 3-17-2003 Williams Deposition# (14) Exhibit Exhibit M - DC License Document# (15) Exhibit Exhibit N - Draft Complaint# (16) Exhibit Exhibit O - 5-5-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (17) Exhibit Exhibit P - 5-6-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (18) Exhibit Exhibit Q - Westover Declaration# (19) Exhibit Exhibit R - Production Document# (20) Exhibit Exhibit S - Ott Deposition Excerpts# (21) Exhibit Exhibit T - Production Document# (22) Affidavit Declaration of K Grundeman# (23) Statement of Facts Statement of Undisputed Facts# (24) Text of Proposed Order # (25) Certificate of Service)(Goldfrank, Sarah)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 07, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.116226/gov.uscourts.dcd.116226.33.18.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2007-03-08 00:00:00-05:00
Retrieved
2026-11-07 06:51:31.940936-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
561368
SHA-256
815ba96d9af61411fc261e19b2664078f33c0643f9e7c0cd128b07efaa3e7236

Document text

17 page(s), 20,470 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 17

EXHIBIT Q


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document33-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MARIALICE BATHRUS WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 1:05CV01483

VS.
Judge John D. Bates

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION, et al. |
DECLARATION OF KATHRYN

Defendants. WESTOVER

I, Kathryn “Kate” Westover, hereby declare as follows:

1, I am not a party to the above-captioned action. I am over eighteen years of age,
and the statements made herein are based on my personal knowledge. I refreshed my
recollection through the review of the documents attached hereto at Tab A.

2. In or about August 2001, plaintiff Marialice Williams and I had a meeting with
representatives from Fannie Mae’s Multifamily Division to discuss the possible use of captive
insurance companies by Fannie Mae. I do not remember any additional meetings with
representatives from Fannie Mae on this or any other subject, although there may have been a

telephone phone conference call before or after the meeting on this subject.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on

(DATE) at Colchester, Vermont.
3f/e7 fikr A Se lovee

Kathryn Westover


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document 33-19 Filed G6/21/2007 Page dof?


Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Documentac-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4oafi7
/ Animemaindceeneon con ; Q ot a . a : - | 7 ~ kaye! _ ; t

etn "Subject: J A few w questions 2 and an update from RMS, Co a

pe "Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:16:10-0400 oe five
we “From: "Marialice Williams" <marlalice@worldnet. attnet> - | ; 7 |

a - To: <thoda:s_newman@fanniemae.com>, <grace._ uebscher@fanniemae. coms bE" shat pmo,
7 é 7 CG <bhartsfield@risk-intgation com> . 4 A

i: Update fom RMS a

‘First the good news--we have the interest af three i insurance companies, two ‘of whom are domestic Alle are erated At and above.
‘ However, Wwe need | to ‘know a conple of things to facilitate c our discussions with them:

7 4, is there 2 any. interest on Fannie: Mae's part in insuring her portion of the 5-20% mezzanine level of risk on the DUS Spot? a
oe (This ¢ could fead toa lower premium for the lenders). . . ’

en 2. Does Fannie Mae have: any ny objection to the DUS lenders slaying off all or past of thee first.loss 5 obligation on the DUS joans to a- .
ae "AA" or better rated credit enhancer? ©
4, Is is there any j possibilty of obtaining data from Fannie Mae regarding the underwriting and performance of the DUS portfolio?
’ The Keen interest is in what percentage of the mortgage loans originated meet the various.tiers of the DUS program and has there
: been a distinction in the’ performance based upon those tiers of Loans? .

' Sorry that we were unable to get Kate Westover i in to see you in June, We only need about. and hour. and a half. Isthereatimein
July th that will work? Also, if yous find that there is room because of a cancellation | in June we would te happy to Bilin. SS

. We. don't need all of ‘the answers to our questions. at one time. As soon as you have some idea about each question, tet us know.
Thanks, Marialice ,

wine DUS portivi”

Hanrand Be ire

‘oh —_ ; | - Fe | _ — 10496 ‘53/01 9:53 AN.

FNMA.MBW.008031
CONFIDENTIAL


a

‘ wo
ot ot

Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19 Filed 06/21/2007, Page 5 of 17

to

“> plvd: Captive Insurance, Cosnpany Update}

» Siibjects [Fra Captive Insurance Companty Update],
_Daté: Wed,-06 Jun 2001 12:21:05-0500
iE rom: Bob Jones <bobjones@cam-fi nancial.com>
Tor Awgroves@bellsouth net, chockrumsey eam financial. com

: Bob. Jones weoke:"

1 ‘advised’ ‘Marialice to copy both Red ‘capital and Lend Lease on ‘this. :

‘“ .message to Richard and Grace, . just as if she never saw the Fannie. Mae.

email. régarding Craig: Ott.

“This reversal by IRS now offers Fannie Mae and/or each bUS Lender to ,

.. > form their’ own captive under the same "economic family” for balance:

sheet ‘treatment: with the captive first loss premium now’ tax deductible, ao .

“The IRS ruling also acknowledges. the shift of captive first loss from

-* the the policy holder to the. insurer for risk transfer. Our copyrigtited ;

“MCRI policy is acceptable for risk transfer and. could be used by AIG, ©

oe Gen Star. or Zurich to front the: captive. coverage.

oc

7 “Subject: Captive h Insirance Conipany Upaate

Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:13:44 -0400 -
From: "Marialice Williams” <marialice@worldnet att. net>
To: <prace_ huebscher@fanniemae. com>, <richard_s. _laweh@fanniemae.c com>
_- CC: <mebeisler@redcapitalgroup.com>, <jklarson@lendleaserei. comp,
| <rhoda_ e _newman@fanniemae. com>, > <bhartsfield@risk-mitigation. com> |

. On June 4, 2001, the IRS issued 3 ‘ling that has the i insurance world reeling. The Jong standing pe position that premiuins 0s paid to

captives are e not deductible under + the So-called." economic family” theory has been reversed.

- The IRS, in 1977, took the f position that "in the case of related- -party risks, if such. risks are insured of reinsuréd by arelated
_ insurance cosnmpany—one in the same ‘economic family, ‘the premiums involved cannot be deducted from federal taxes because risk --

'. :has not shifted from the. policyholder to, the insurer."
: "Accordingly, the IRS will no longer invoke the economic family theory with respect to captive insurance transactions. ”
‘After this new ruling, iti is clear that the captive! is an ideal way to Jay off the first loss obligation of assetholders entering into ©
_*: secondary market transactions. This ruling can-enable Fannie Mae to set UP its own credit enhancement facility. Andi in light of
Fannié ¢ Mae’ s credit, the capitalization costs would be minimal. =~ .

The DUS lenders could set up such a fond with their DUS reserve accounts and obtain substantial economic benefit as well a as”

reducing I Fannié Mae's exposure to the risk associated with this portfolio, That's because any policy issued by a DUS lender's

lof2-

captive insurance compariy: would be wrapped or fronted bya rated remsurer.

oy My associate and I serve on the Captive Advisory Committee for the District of Columbia's Depariment of Insurance and Securities
_ Regulation. Our new law was pattemed after the Vermont statute which is considered the best domestic jurisdiction in which to
_ form a captive: Just one. captive has applied for and been approved | to operated i in D.C. This could have all kinds of positive -
- ramifications for Fannie Mae. . .

re a

_ Our associate, Kate Westover, i in Vermont, is assisting us with our customers. She will be consulting with Larry Mirrel,

the Commissioner for. DISR on 1 June 14 while you guys at F annie Mae will be out of town, We had hope to bring. her by.

7 Meanwhile, my aisociate, Harvey } Hartsfield continues to work with Rhoda on a time ‘for Kate. to make a presentation to Fannie
‘Mae. 7

10514 6/6/01 12:33 PM |

FENMA.MBW. 008054
CONFIDENTIAL


Case 1 O5-Cv-01483-JD8 _ Document 33-19 Filed 06/21/2007 . Page 6 Oba7

*ppoude Captive Insurance Company Update] © = 2

Ry: Feél free to call if you have questions. . Marialice uo

i

2of2 © _ oO | . oe 7 oo a 10515 6/6/01 12:31 PM

FNMA.MBW.008052
CONFIDENTIAL


Case 1:05-ov-01483-JD8 Document 3o-19 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 7 of 17
* apiive ins unis : 7 7 7

ae | Subject: Captive Tasurance Companies.

7 Se a) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:29:30 -0400 ©

UL Byoim: "Risk-Mit" <marialice@risk-mitigation.com>._ —

“Tor <dgoodman@redcapitalgroup. com>, incbeisler@redcapitalgroup. com> : :
OG ‘<bhartsfield@risk-mitigation.c com>, "Bob I ones” <bobjones@cam-fnancal com> -

my “ Harvey and Is saw ‘the quoies ‘from Davidi in an attidle in ithe Multi-Housing ‘News for June 2001. Giad tos see that you guys a are - mo
i. ‘anticipating another successful year in refinancing apartment b bullding mortgages. ee _

a We just ‘wanted to reinind you that 0 our captive insuranite company concept has just been given 2 boost by the new ‘Revenue Ruling
| from IRS: Our associate, Kate Westover gave an excellent: Presentation at at the Department of Ir Insurance and. Securities Regulation
_ last week, Several off our clients were in attendance. :

“* Rate was able to confirm for Larry, Mire, the head of DISR that the new Reyeme Raiting by the IRS, 2001 31, provides for the’
-. deductibility of premiums paid to captive insurance comipanies by captive insurance company owners. And further bolsters the .
-. ° ‘concept, that captive insurance companies, owned by a related company or parent, are true insurance companies, Therefore, oncéa
- _ captive issues a policy to cover the risk ona portfolio of assets there is a true risk transfer from the related or parent company to
: ‘the captive. Therefore, our clients who are concemed about risk-based capital i issués can now form a captive insurance company,
: "transfer the risk of Joss of their loan n portfolio to the- captive. insurancé - company and get t the accounting and balance sheet relief that ,
_— they need. © a . s . _

_ And, if used j in connection with securitization, the captive insurance company policy is the credit enhancement necessary to . .
eliminate the need to ISSUE SUBORDINATE SECURITIES.

Also, D. C. has approved the first captive insurance ¢ company wy under the new D. C. captive insurancé law. We are on the captive
_ _| “advisory committee for D.C, and are more committed than ever to bringing this innovative risk transfer concept to our customers.
- - We are happy to be able to provide this innovative tool to our F customers ona local basis. ‘The off-shore jurisdictions have.
dominated this busiriess for the past 30 years. - .

oo Let'us know if you would like to see the documentation on the revenue e ruling or want to disess the use of the captive insurance as
“18 Fisk-transfer credit enhancement facility i in your day to day operations, , noah ite are

- - Marialice Williams

were “Riki dhobe, shes 4

) ES RHE Gombiate d

cE WO OUP CuSstorhgiy

* ibe WES
bof} 10519 6/18/01 4:45 PM,

FNMA.MBW.008054 -
CONFIDENTIAL


ete

Case 1:05-cv-01480-JD8 Document 3o-19 Filed OG/e1/2007 Page of 17

oP eeONU Ue reese ta.
a . * oe ‘iT :

ee

~ Subj j ect: Presentation on + August aa

Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:49:18 0400. ‘
“From: "mail risk-mitigation.com" “marialioe@ristomitigation com>
-. To: "Rhoda E Newman” <thoda: e _hewman@fanniemae, com>,
 <grace_ huebscher@fanniemae. com>...

CC: <bhartsfi fe lO@aiskemmitigation.com> :

| Sy We’ are’ looking fo forward to inectirig with you of Athe 21st of ‘August ‘However, we want to make certain that Kate ison

'. ! “4arget-with her presentation. Gould you please let us. know if you are looking at the captive as a potential 6 credit
os “enhancement tool for Fannie Mae or. as a tool that the DUS lenders could use.

fr

~ J met with LendLease’ Chief Crédit Officer and the CFOi in Dallas last week. There. appears {fo be ir interest on their
-.” part in using a captive insurance company as a risk transfer and credit enhancement vehicle but they were -
. = concerned about Fannie Mae's reaction to the concept of captive. insurance companies. . Also, it appeared to

“ LendLease that the captive could be-very effective if they could also lay off their 5% first loss obligation under the .

, DUS program to the captive i insurance company. This, question was 5 raised i in my: e-ail to you back on: May 30.

tof!

, : Finally. could we spend a little time discussing the other iwo questions from the insurance companies that we 2 posed .
to you at the end of May? .

i My partner, Harvey Harsh eld will be working with Kate on her presentation sO pleat s@ 6C him. on your response.

. Thanks. Marialice _

wea sib Uner the
oo on May oo

ene 2
Bp lita ae peer

10522 seo 12:00 PM

FNMA.MBW.008057
CONFIDENTIAL


Page 9 of 17

Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB  Bocument 33-19

Filed 06/27/2007

Bega

4 " :o *

aingiisig: saat og - Kampsredoig PUP Jottuapyys Wor)

a WHOS TYSON To NO saa WARTS,

_— ~ ee mn, . ; _Saryned ‘naysenaniq siq) wt UO TULeyeE Auposouasy wopeu 20juy 2 low 10g

ag poanitoag

pe NOLLATOS BALLEVO GL

t :Ag ques

‘ZEOE BEE 20 |

tHdSS:2

z ebeg:

ENMA.MBW.008060

19-82 -Bny

CONFIDENTIAL


Page 10 af 17

riled 06/21/2007

Case 1:05-cv-01483-JD8 Document 33-19

-s 6tS0R

7 .
ee

; Bop eran
: ano

ns : - . . = oo “papain, 10 9 unoape Buayavepin poebelbes Auese4 eney feu (spaunsuy Ss} fa paiumo 104) enydieo paiosuods v : <
| | ; | | ““dysieuno ou ing seunp pue sub Buyney yendeo

“angen 10 Jewel 40 juedpaied e ‘8g few 1 yeumo owed e eq 40 omded on uMmo Aeus pansy poyearsiydos ay bh
7 - _ ualhsul peyuupe-tow e WOY souemsi eseypind pug

no : | - . : ; Lo ySHI 10 suunotue jue rere a aunce oui sey UOItn edueinsul jo sehng jejoveutu09 e sl paunaul peyeaysiydos By <
| | | “wiaisks ojeinbai AOUBINSUt retovacuuoa |

eu 40 spisino .Speinsuy paieonsndo, jo Ss aun yo aouesisure! 10 @oueunsu ay 8} asoditid Areutid s aaydes ay L «

_Reoideee eB 10. ‘enna B “fuedios sors @ 88 uieo ~ ~ vedio souenst esodind ejpeds ¥ «

sop doy 8  geandege syjeyyy |

7Ag ues .

t
.

-£EOe BEE cOc

“Wd9S:Z

e ebeg

- 10-92- Bry

FNMA.MBW.008061

CONFIDENTIAL


Page Tioahi7 —

Filed 06/21/2007 —

Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19
-  OESOF

“pe uM

sn faiofew © an ‘000 £ sano ie payeuse are uojeredo iueuno uy | Sangdeo ing ejgequun are sonsnens opm PUOM

- . “syeuin) se eouesnisu) eandies seziuBoo91 mou OIVN aun Aysnpul entide e usiigeise ° Sun ae SeqR\S snosauwnyy

“uenieH, fq pamortoy ‘painsuy sn 10}. Syojuiop alcysuo Buipes; ou owinaaq qUOULaA ' s0g6t au ur

—_ *sajpuwop ardusyo ul senyiteo ysoui 404 sabejueape xe] pereuiuye uoje(si6o) uoweiodion ub, 10} patio mod
7 : . Z a “, =. 7 "suitteg pueio, ha Pamonoy speznsuy 'g n 404 efonuop Bx0USHO Supe, ou. susesen epnuniog, ‘so i pile s0961 an uy
7 - aS . . _ | ’ 7 eueouy H Bunusepuin
Pov fe tion bee . “soos Aveo au in om uy pewoy Buraq
- no we Poe “seins ‘senbuyoo} aay ietno veut 16604 sdeyied peasn u22q sey = Wsquitypous uy ues souesmayy andes |
7 . . Z - . ua 7 7 . _ “tiopeznunas xsi (Kqusces you) pue @OUBINSUT i188 peyljenb "s9]aqeonpop pe) iy. ‘serpy. payer ftenioadsonas

oF : . : : os se’ ons sveiBoud d Buypuny 84 BAIEWIO YE: Bupoye - a - asuodse: e s| yewew . LUV, 10 sajsues it 84 @ANeU sayy ay "

“auinsse QO} Buy St 1 Kueditos squeinsuy ou ey sys aney Kew Aaay} 10-

ne be moe 7 | ‘ontnaya 3800 3 jou feu fuedwsoo soueinsy fepvounwca B ™ ys 494) Jo ie 10 sejsuey ‘Spaunsuy pereonsidos 40.4

Meg A te Seandeg Jo Aojsiy aug

- “| safes dep,

Aa A A Aa A

{72108 BEE zOz

t0-Be~Sny

+ SWdBS22

y-26eg

FNMA.MBW.008062
CONFIDENTIAL


Page 120817

Filed 06/21/2007 _

| Case 10S-cv-01483-JD8 © Document 33-19

“eBesence pue suey ‘bp s 880] 1BA0 JORucd - sn09} WweweSovew yeu panaichiy “p

a - 7 . ne oo ° | : ; . oct vopustes g anydes ou} exoge pug. ingyen (Hog 48 fo sejsuen jo S00 UY uoronpey ‘S
: : . ? : : e; a . ‘ ; ws oe 7 m8H Buu y uy Ayaeyeoun sonpas a1 paunstij ue e $0 infige eu enoidu o} Buxjuncoce eoueitisu jo esn z

7 : : oe , a ; are ‘sumioid stanonpap io > SOUEINSU 1 398 ued JeUUEW onmnaye 3860 evolu e ul su. pauneat Surouey 40) werveoewy Vv Le

SM ie owes éSFALdvo 3SN OL SNNLLNOD S.GSYNSNI OG AHM.

:AG 29S

£7108 BEE 202

Lo-92-Sny

ind9Siz2

— S abeg

FNMA.MBW.008063

CONFIDENTIAL


Page 13 af 17

rilect 06/21/2007 |

Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19

a 7 Sona | “fom 108 adoos s “eIep 880, # Aniseene uodn Supuodep ‘aro 40 utious : .

Phage Da Wb ek - | 3 wvieowd aALdvo V ONILNAW2 GMI

, Do darhgn

“Nouvonaav: BHD ONT waLdv yaa 5 OL +. aasyaoit amivnsh SI aAWLaWO v

SLNAWZSHOV LnvatoLieve NSIS 40 SSYVHS anssi a

_-Byeon e~

80m | a _NOLLYHOEYOONT YO IW ‘6

_"soudinsute 0 5 Bd pte seBerasc0 isodn  Bupuedep alow 40 sian a NOLWINAWINDON | ONLLIUMMSONN g

_(iedioo wuewisteiiew 10 Aawioye oroquiop fq auop eq AeW) yea, 1 Ont ONY NOLLWuV date NOLVOMddy

"akin e- mie ‘peanbau Ti - ‘SuRaIAOUd BOINUES | 0 NOLLOSTaS ‘amotWod OL LISIA °

“patnbat nate os iesoidie pieog s2ureUN ka pouijuuiayep uy LL

]
NWIe ssanisng 40. WAOMdaY ‘g
“MOIAAL Jepjoyarsys pue- uopeveded 403 sider ez mony _ p

| NOWVavdTud NWid SSSNISNg °
"susie jurdsqied 10 smerAg' ssjorne auedand | SA0ge z LRM weutot0o a ; NOLNANNSOR ALWUOAYOD €.

“suowieynbor eolieunsue pue Bun.toa Uodn Bupuedep 8594 £0 uo, t

. ; Rants alniaisvas +
“RMU GaaWALSa | 2 lee noe Ce Sg

| WHaLvTIOD NOMONY NOULWZMWLIeW9 ‘SiNNOOoV MNVE Nido ' bb
ee » SNOLLMOSSa ONDINVE SSV¥d ‘SUBOtIIO 19373 Ol ONS TWNOLLWZINYSuO aioH ‘01

-ONRuNLONLS NYHOOUe ae

'

' sAg ques -

£7108 GEE zor

10-92 -5ny

“LwdZg:z.

6/9 ebeg

MBW.008064
ENTIAL

FNMA.
CONFID


Page 14 of 17

Filed 06/21/2007

Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-19

ae so _ sexe) dando —

meee a HEYA

= . = fe _ epoyores

“res

res / seydms pue Sontasoy

. pue oyroads 1Op |
omens |
| POPS»

|. vonnng eBay ;

» Azenioyipny ;

2 TRIDHOD

‘ :Ag .ues

sUnupy
8 Old

a ee ee
ae a soxe yt ]UdIy]

f- surssaoxg

$29 wos sure}o yy.

5 ieee safe mono

ee | _Aumedinog qwo4y

= spp me 1 t 7

1, anda

a. UMuuierg soaig Ande “y

_Pamnsuy

"2308 BEE 202 |

sieassy sande,

| ino :

to-ez-Sny

| ‘SUOISSTUNWOS sure :
WaOU
“ap0) uunfutas SsO1t PUTO 7

*HidZS:2

6/L abeg

FNMA.MBW.008065
CONFIDENTIAL


Page 15 of 17

Filed 06/21/2007

Case 1 5-Cv-O4 463-JDE Rocument 33-19

dae  oL.

a © a - 7 _ : Saxe) angio . ~ | So
ree fe oa py
ie or #8 TerOUOH

Fg VNWI

Seen

| | SARS. |
os -gourenssy puog.
ff seaneauag .
Sy yeydes —

ee 1, - shunoooy "nde

K \ _ ose S ~ _ - syuMOs0Y
+> O\ Pes rezareyog”

-pasnsuy yore 10J tae) pnts
_AALLEW O-

 BALLEVO .,

" stopfoyareys oande, 10°

z= (a0) amaoig ssoap, 2

SINY d] OULU CRINSNI aa

- SUOISSTUNOD sUTE}OY

108, nob “SANNA 40 MOTE NOILVZILRINOS SRI

at
TR ta
ah

! :hg les |

{4408 Bee Z02

Lo-82-Bny

*MdZG:Z

6/8 abeg

FNMA.MBW.008066
CONFIDENTIAL


Page 16 0f 17

Filed 06/21/2007

Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB — Document 33-19

sie | BoHgadO ONO! .  ANOWUSIA:
on ig Pe @BYOsNogs”

we
.

Pn be a | epntuueg ul peuoyde

oe . Lo : aooe
~ 900'SS

en ie Se

2 BYNd

ade oa,

PauiNba. UoneoyyEo exlesau Jeujsyy pUe ved ssauisng Jo adoos Aq paurpuiaieg
JuOUlla/ 10) Pauinber ‘sioyenGar ‘sleptAoid AKAs YAM JBdLU 0} BLOILUOD O} SHSIA,

eo. gopig.’

20p'deatyn

-- “uspjoumeys JO uone09; pue sOujoow PIO 205 BuyjoAedy suosiad jo raguinti vo quapusdag “IA
anjanys weiBold pue sysfjeue SSO} JOUOUM pur
eS  Q0O'SS LaUTUNLU untied Jo juaoted e st xe} Lund

Saowies Sulunosoe 0 adooe Aq paused YA
LA YEU) a]0U ' BojoYs eyoILUOP Aq paulituajad -*1A

olssajaud pur ain feyenjae yo unowe Aq peuluueap Oq [WM S}SOO fBUOIppY +

. | ‘SBION:
mon, - Q | -efeya BuyoBu0 pajrupes 10)

: _  Bugjasyy B0}D0N1Q 10 PIBOR ‘tin
cp  , 8B72UD [BHdegwey Auditing juewebeueyy ‘WA

| XBL Auedwodae} esusay jenuuy ‘10.

Gd (a
|) a, SeBuryp uonemuos peyeuinse (OL
| ae suneew pue jeaws) A)
— O000ES ueid ssalisng 10 uoneayidde sof Apnys Awiqiseay +)
-  YORWYRE - | -
Bund”

SS” SS RORBETET Cy

a a - “ (xe) jesapo}: pue Buypuey swer ‘souemnsuret jf \s00 Burpryaxe ‘sayetugse eaijenesuog)

ae idcles we mee ec, Ub MBL JO UoRpAIEs Aq pauliuateg “1.
* . Uoeoydde 10} 99; Metne! 40 ‘jeqdes aueys yo junowe uodn peseq eq Aew

ess 7 aoinpe Bugunesse pue rebs| ‘xe} peu ;

7 feueny pur ypny a

:A@ JUeS

t

‘708 BEE 202

‘t0-e2-5ny

“HILS 2

6/6 abeg

067
MA.MBW.008
GONFIDENTIAL


Case 1:05-cv-01483-JD2 Document 30-19 Filed 06/21/2007 — Page 17 of 17

” Washingdsi Muna Transaition ~
"Subjects ‘Washington Mutual Transaction: “
.. Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:45:56 -0500 =
From: Bob Jones <bobjones(@cant financial cori en ee
Bo: marialice@risk-mitigation. com,  dwgroves@bellsonth nt bobjones@ean-fin nancial com. |
Bob’ Jones wrote: 7 o Roars Seg eget ae a Wo ie

 Mardalice,; Karl ‘returned my cali.’ No.. insurance. . Fannie Mae required. a.. = ;
_ spread account that accrues ( no front end $ ) to” 50 bpts. plus first: . mo eT, em!
‘loss recourse of some number -(confidential) south of: 4%.-: Fannie Mae's” 0 te
initial recourse level was 6%.- _. The portfolio has 12 year- weighted
_ average seasoning: Fannie. Mae ‘wouldn't. ‘disclose. its CPR, ‘but. Karl used
a CPR of 4%. He was very happy with this deal. :

: He also told’ me the average. ‘recourse on a Fannie Mae ‘pis portfolio. swap’
“; ranges from 9 to 428. Real’ interesting.“ I hope, this information is -
- . helpful. ; mae ee es - =

Good luck: on the, captive presentation with Kate and. Fannie Mae next
_ week. - ; a oe! .

ae CORTE

. 40537 |. :
tof) | 8/16/01 9:49 AM

CONFIDENTIAL