CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC. v. SELIG — Entry #40: ORDER granting 39 Motion for Protective Order
Case: CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC. v. SELIG dcd · 1:26-cv-02157
filed June 18, 2026
What this document is
Docket entry #40 · filed September 11, 2026
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Protective Order. It is hereby STIPULATED, AGREED, and ORDERED that this Protective Order shall govern as stated herein. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/11/2026. (lcckk3) (Entered: 09/11/2026)
Who is involved
- CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.
- COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
- HYPERLIQUID POLICY CENTER
- MICHAEL S. SELIG
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: a spelling of its name “Marathon Digital Holdings” appears in a filing in this case.
…hedging programs in SEC filings:MarathonDigitalHoldings (now MARA Holdings) ran…
- CleanSpark: its project “Washington” appears in a filing in this case.
…Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20581 Re: KalshiEX LLC – Commission…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 06, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
5 page(s), 9,693 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:26-cv-02157-CKK Document 40 Filed 09/11/26 Page 1 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE
INC.,
Case No. l :26-cv-02157-CKK
Plaintiff,
V.
MICHAELS . SELIG, in his official capacity as
Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission; COMMODITY FUTURES
TRADING COMMISSION,
Defendants.
PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS IN THE
ADMINISTRATTVE RECORD
Defendants Michael S. Selig, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") are
including certain documents in the administrative record that contain confidential or sensitive
commercial, · financial and/or business information of a CFTC-designated contract market
("DCM") that is not a party to this litigation. To facilitate the production, review and use of these
documents in this case, the parties jointly request that the Court enter an order to protect this
confidential information ("Protective Order").
Accordingly, It is hereby STIPULATED, AGREED, and ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants shall designate as "Confidential" any portions of the record that contain
confidential or sensitive commercial, financial and/or business information. Specifically,
Defendants will identify any such portions as "Confidential" by highlighting the text.
2. This Protective Order shall govern the use of all portions of the administrative
record designated as Confidential by Defendants. All Parties to this Action and their attorneys, as
Case 1:26-cv-02157-CKK Document 40 Filed 09/11/26 Page 2 of 5
well as non-party participants, shall comply with the terms and procedures set forth below with
respect to documents and materials designated as "Confidential" by Defendants. Notwithstanding
anything else contained herein, nothing in this Protective Order shall in any way limit the right of
a producing or supplying party (hereinafter "Producing Party") to make whatever use it deems
appropriate of its own documents.
3. Under this Protective Order, Defendants shall have the right to identify and
designate any portions of the administrative record as "Confidential" when Defendants in good
faith believe it contains information that is proprietary, confidential, commercially sensitive
information protected by the Commodity Exchange Act, CFTC regulations, or the Trade Secrets
Act, or contains other confidential research, development, or commercial information as such
terms are used in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(l)(G).
4. Absent consent of Defendants or an order from this Court, materials designated
Confidential pursuant to this Protective Order and/or any information derived therefrom shall only
be disclosed to or made available by: ( 1) outside counsel who have appeared on behalf of a party
in this litigation ("counsel of record"), including their partners, counsel, associates, and staff; (2)
any third-party witness retained only for the purposes of this litigation; (3) the Court and its
personnel, (4) any other person or entity authorized by law; and (5) any other person only upon
order of the Court or upon stipulation of the parties.
5. Counsel of record are responsible for employing reasonable measures to control
access to and distribution of information designated Confidential and shall keep all documents
designated as Confidential secure within their possession. Each person accessing or receiving
information designated as Confidential shall receive, process, use, store, maintain, disclose,
transmit, backup, handle extracts of, and dispose of such information: (i) only in compliance with
2
Case 1:26-cv-02157-CKK Document 40 Filed 09/11/26 Page 3 of 5
the terms of this Protective Order; (ii) in a location and manner sufficient to protect such
information from unauthorized access or disclosure; and (iii) in accordance with industry standard
safeguards and applicable Federal information confidentiality and security laws and regulations.
6. To the extent that any materials designated as Confidential under this Protective
Order are filed with the Court, they shall only be submitted under seal, with a motion to seal
consistent with this Court's Local Rule 5.1 (h). Plaintiff Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (CME)
will redact any portion of a document that it files on the public docket that quotes from or otherwise
reproduces material designated as Confidential. Defendants must file a response justifying the
redactions within seven (7) business days. If Defendants fail to do so or the Court does not grant
the motion to seal, the information will no longer be designated as Confidential.
7. The parties agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order pending its entry
by the Court or pending the entry of an alternative thereto which is satisfactory to all parties, and
any violation of its terms shall be subject to the same sanctions and penalties as if this Protective
Order had been entered by the Court.
8. Defendants may withdraw the designation of Confidential at any time during the
pendency of this matter.
9. If Plaintiff disputes whether any portions of the administrative record are properly
designated as Confidential, the parties agree to attempt to resolve such dispute among themselves.
The parties must confer and make reasonable efforts to resolve their differences. In the event the
parties cannot resolve the dispute, the designation of confidentiality may be challenged upon
motion. The non-party DCM that designated the material as confidential to the CFTC shall have
the opportunity to appear to protect its interests.
Case 1:26-cv-02157-CKK Document 40 Filed 09/11/26 Page 4 of 5
10. Within sixty (60) days of the conclusion of this litigation and any appeal thereof,
all material treated as Confidential under this Protective Order shall be destroyed or returned. Any
work product that contains Confidential information under this Protective Order shall be destroyed.
Counsel ofrecord for Plaintiff shall make written confirmations of compliance with this return or
destruction requirement to counsel for Defendants not more than ninety (90) days after final
termination of this litigation. The Clerk of the Court may return to counsel for Defendants, or
destroy, any Confidential sealed material at the end of the litigation, including any appeals.
11. After the conclusion of this litigation, the provisions of this Protective Order shall
continue to be binding and this Court shall retain jurisdiction over all persons who have access to
documents designated as Confidential produced pursuant to this Protective Order for the purpose
of enforcement of this Protective Order, including any appropriate sanctions for violations.
Continue on next page.
4
Case 1:26-cv-02157-CKK Document 40 Filed 09/11/26 Page 5 of 5
Dated: September 11, 2026 Respectfully submitted by:
Isl Aitan D. Goe/man Isl M Jordan Minot
Aitan D. Goelman (D.C. Bar No. 446636) M. Jordan Minot (DC Bar No. 1722554)
Ivano M. Ventresca (D.C. Bar No. 1045769)
Brian J. Beaton, Jr. (D.C. Bar No. 90020963) TYLER S. BADGLEY
General Counsel
ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP M. JORDAN MINOT
2100 L Street NW, Suite 400 Deputy General Counsel
Washington, DC 20037 ANDREW J. WEISBERG
Tel: (202) 778-1800 Senior Assistant General Counsel
Fax: (202) 822-8136 HENRY J. DICKMAN
[email protected] Senior Assistant General Counsel
[email protected] CARLIN METZGER
[email protected] Senior Assistant General Counsel
Attorneys for Plaintiff Chicago Mercantile U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Exchange, Inc. 1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
Tel: (202) 209-1087
Fax: (202) 418-5567
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Attorneys for Defendants Michael S. Selig and
CFTC.
SO ORDERED.
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY
United States District Judge
5
