Sadowski v. LawNewz, Inc. — Entry #17: ORDER, It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by July 7, 2025
Case: Sadowski v. LawNewz, Inc. nysd · 1:25-cv-02917
filed April 09, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #17 · filed June 16, 2025
ORDER, It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by July 7, 2025. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 15.1, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/rules, any amended complaint should be filed with a redline showing all differences between the original and revised filings. Plaintiff will not be given any further opportunity to amend the complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss. If no amended complaint is filed, Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss by July 7, 2025. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed by July 14, 2025. Finally, it is further ORDERED that the initial pretrial conference previously scheduled for July 17, 2025 is adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. ( Amended Pleadings due by 7/7/2025., Responses due by 7/7/2025, Replies due by 7/14/2025.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/16/25) (yv) (Entered: 06/16/2025)
Who is involved
- Christopher Sadowski
- LawNewz, Inc.
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Page 5 of 25 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 2013 WL 4777189 (N.D. Ca. 2013)……………………………
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 09, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 3,170 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:25-cv-02917-JMF Document 17 Filed 06/16/25 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------X
:
CHRISTOPHER SADOWSKI, :
:
Plaintiff, : 25-CV-2917 (JMF)
:
-v- : ORDER
:
LAWNEWZ, INC., :
:
Defendant. :
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:
On June 13, 2025, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 15. Under Rule 15(a)(1)(B), a plaintiff has
twenty-one (21) days after the service of a motion under Rule 12(b) to amend the complaint once
as a matter of course.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by
July 7, 2025. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 15.1, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/
rules, any amended complaint should be filed with a redline showing all differences between the
original and revised filings. Plaintiff will not be given any further opportunity to amend the
complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss.
If Plaintiff does amend, by three (3) weeks after the amended complaint is filed,
Defendant shall: (1) file an answer; (2) file a new motion to dismiss; or (3) file a letter on ECF
stating that it relies on the previously filed motion to dismiss. If Defendant files an answer or a
new motion to dismiss, the Court will deny the previously filed motion to dismiss as moot. If
Defendant files a new motion to dismiss or indicates that it relies on its previously filed motion
to dismiss, any opposition shall be filed within fourteen days, and any reply shall be filed within
seven days of any opposition.
If no amended complaint is filed, Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to
dismiss by July 7, 2025. Defendant’s reply, if any, shall be filed by July 14, 2025.
Finally, it is further ORDERED that the initial pretrial conference previously scheduled
for July 17, 2025 is adjourned sine die.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 16, 2025 __________________________________
New York, New York JESSE M. FURMAN
United States District Judge