Long, M.D. v. Dorset — Entry #85: JUDGMENT signed by Judge Phyllis J
Case: Long, M.D. v. Dorset cand · 4:17-cv-02758
filed May 12, 2017
What this document is
Docket entry #85 · filed September 17, 2021
JUDGMENT signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2021) (Entered: 09/17/2021)
Who is involved
- Bandha Yoga Publications, LLC
- Facebook, Inc.
- Raymond Long, M.D.
- Tammy Dorset
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
…01/22/19 Page 5 of 21 1 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 2013 U.S. LEXIS 65802 (N.D. Cal. May…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 12, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 4,603 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 4:17-cv-02758-PJH Document 85 Filed 09/17/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5 RAYMOND LONG, M.D., et al.,
Case No. 17-cv-02758-PJH
6 Plaintiffs,
7 v. JUDGMENT
8 TAMMY DORSET, et al.,
9 Defendants.
10
11
12 On February 22, 2019, the court dismissed plaintiffs Raymond Long, M.D.’s and
United States District Court
13 Bandha Yoga Publications, LLC’s (collectively, “plaintiff”) claims in the above-entitled
14 action against defendant Facebook, Inc. (“defendant Facebook”) with and without
15 prejudice. Dkt. 45. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amen ded pleading against defendant
Northern District of California
16 Facebook with respect to those claims dismissed without prejudice. Dkt. 60. On
17 December 11, 2019, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims against defendant Tammy
18 Dorset (“defendant Dorset”) and any related Doe defendant for failure to serve. Dkt. 61.
19 On December 11, 2019, the court entered judgment against plaintiff. Dkt. 62.
20 On April 23, 2021, the Ninth Circuit affirmed this court’s dismissal with prejudice of
21 all plaintiff’s claims against defendant Facebook, except for the claim for contributory
22 copyright infringement. Dkt. 65. The panel directed this court to permit plaintiff to leave
23 to amend that single claim. On September 17, 2021, the court again dismissed that claim
24 with prejudice. Thus, the court has finally adjudicated all claims in this action.
25 It is Ordered and Adjudged
26 that plaintiff take nothing, and that the action against defendant Facebook again
27 be dismissed with prejudice and that the action against defendant Dorset and any related
28 Doe defendants be dismissed without prejudice.
Case 4:17-cv-02758-PJH Document 85 Filed 09/17/21 Page 2 of 2
1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 Dated: September 17, 2021
3 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
4 United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
United States District Court
13
14
15
Northern District of California
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2