WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE — Entry #33: MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER
Case: WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE dcd · 1:05-cv-01483
filed July 28, 2005
What this document is
Docket entry #33 · filed June 21, 2007
MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER (Attachments: # (1) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment# (2) Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Grace Huebscher and Deposition Excerpts# (3) Exhibit Exhibit B - 3-28-2007 Williams Dep and Exhibit# (4) Exhibit Exhibit C - Fannie Mae's Interrogatory Responses# (5) Exhibit Exhibit D - Declaration of Richard Lawch# (6) Exhibit Exhibit E - 3-21-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (7) Exhibit Exhibit F - 5-7-2007 Williams Deposition and Exhibit# (8) Exhibit Exhibit G - DC Certificate# (9) Exhibit Exhibit H - Jones Deposition and Exhibits# (10) Exhibit Exhibit I - CAM Amended Complaint# (11) Exhibit Exhibit J - CAM Dismissal Order# (12) Exhibit Exhibit K - Williams Interrogatory Responses# (13) Exhibit Exhibit L - 3-17-2003 Williams Deposition# (14) Exhibit Exhibit M - DC License Document# (15) Exhibit Exhibit N - Draft Complaint# (16) Exhibit Exhibit O - 5-5-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (17) Exhibit Exhibit P - 5-6-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (18) Exhibit Exhibit Q - Westover Declaration# (19) Exhibit Exhibit R - Production Document# (20) Exhibit Exhibit S - Ott Deposition Excerpts# (21) Exhibit Exhibit T - Production Document# (22) Affidavit Declaration of K Grundeman# (23) Statement of Facts Statement of Undisputed Facts# (24) Text of Proposed Order # (25) Certificate of Service)(Goldfrank, Sarah)
Who is involved
- FANNIE MAE
- WILLIAMS
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its subsidiary “Sullivan Company” appears in a filing in this case.
…recruited away by another firm known as John 19 F. Sullivan Company in Philadelphia, 20 Pennsylvania. 21 Q.…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 07, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
3 page(s), 1,582 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-6 Filed 06/21/2007 Page1of3 EXHIBIT D Case 1:05-cv-01463-IDB Docurment33-6 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2ot3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARIALICE BATHRUS WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:05CV01483 VS. Judge John D. Bates FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al. : DECLARATION OF RICHARD Defendants. : LAWCH I, Richard Lawch, hereby declare as follows: 1. I have been employed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) since 1991. [ currently hold the position of Senior Vice President of Community Investments. 2. I did not promise Ms. Williams contract business at any time. 3. I did not have any business interactions with Ms. Williams after December 20, 2001, when CAM Financial Services, Inc. “(CAM Financial”) amended the complaint in the lawsuit entitled CAM Financial Services, Inc. v. General Star Nat’l Insurance Co., et al., Civil Action No. 01-314 (S.D. Miss.) to add Fannie Mae as a party. 4. I did not have any business interactions with any officer, director or other representative from CAM Financial after December 20, 2001. 5. I never made false and defamatory comments regarding Ms. Williams to any officer, director or other representative from CAM Financial. 6. [never discouraged CAM Financial from doing business with Ms. Williams. Case 1:05-cv-01463-IDB Docurment33-6 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3of3 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this S. th of Wop Tune 2007 at Bored, : Wid # RICHARD LAWCH.