Sarria v. TELUS International (Cda) Inc. — Entry #45: ORDER The Court is in receipt of Defendants August 18, 2026, letter concerning next steps in this action

Case: Sarria v. TELUS International (Cda) Inc. nysd · 1:25-cv-00889

filed January 30, 2025

What this document is

Docket entry #45 · filed August 25, 2026

ORDER The Court is in receipt of Defendants August 18, 2026, letter concerning next steps in this action. (See Dkt. No. 44.) The Court confirms that its dismissal of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint was without prejudice. If Plaintiff seeks leave to fil e an amended complaint, Plaintiff shall file, by September 1, 2026, a letter brief not to exceed five pages seeking leave to file an amended complaint and showing factually how Plaintiff would amend the Amended Complaint to overcome the deficiencies identified in this Courts August 11, 2026, Decision and Order (Dkt. No. 43). Defendants may respond by letter brief not to exceed five pages within ten days of Plaintiffs filing. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 8/25/2026) (ch)

Who is involved

Gopi Chande
Jeffrey Puritt
Jose Luis Ceron Sarria
Michael Ringman
Mohammed Mohiuddin
Nitin Gadhe
TELUS International (Cda) Inc.
Vanessa Kanu

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

Hut 8: its name “Hut 8 Corp.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Filed 12/10/25 Page 5 of 37 In re Hut 8 Corp. Sec. Litig., 2025 WL 2636150 (S.D.N.Y. Sept…

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 13, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL: https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.636009/gov.uscourts.nysd.636009.45.0.pdf
Kind: court_filing
Publisher: RECAP
Published: 2026-09-23 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved: 2026-10-13 06:40:33.824680-04:00
HTTP status: 200
MIME: application/pdf
Bytes: 153836
SHA-256: 38a75dcf2f718c26f6a9f626c2f7b4dac54c08a5f00763123e7f8f48cf076ba7

Document text

2 page(s), 1,622 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text

Case 1:25-cv-00889-VM    Document 45     Filed 08/25/26   Page 1 of 2


                                                                            8/25/26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


JOSÉ LUIS CERÓN SARRIA, Individually
and on Behalf of All Others Similarly               25 Civ. 0889 (VM)
Situated,
                     Plaintiff,

                  - against -

TELUS INTERNATIONAL (CDA) INC., JEFFREY
PURITT, VANESSA KANU, GOPI CHANDE, AND
MICHAEL RINGMAN,

                        Defendants.


VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.

     The Court is in receipt of Defendants’ August 18, 2026,

letter concerning next steps in this action. (See Dkt. No.

44.) The Court confirms that its dismissal of Plaintiff’s

Amended Complaint was without prejudice. If Plaintiff seeks

leave to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff shall file, by

September 1, 2026, a letter brief not to exceed five pages

seeking   leave    to   file    an   amended   complaint    and   showing

factually how Plaintiff would amend the Amended Complaint to

overcome the deficiencies identified in this Court’s August

11, 2026, Decision and Order (Dkt. No. 43). Defendants may

respond by letter brief not to exceed five pages within ten

days of Plaintiff’s filing.


SO ORDERED.


Case 1:25-cv-00889-VM   Document 45   Filed 08/25/26   Page 2 of 2


Dated:     25 August 2026
           New York, New York

                                          _________________________
                                               Victor Marrero
                                                  U.S.D.J.