WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE — Entry #33: MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER
Case: WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE dcd · 1:05-cv-01483
filed July 28, 2005
What this document is
Docket entry #33 · filed June 21, 2007
MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER (Attachments: # (1) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment# (2) Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Grace Huebscher and Deposition Excerpts# (3) Exhibit Exhibit B - 3-28-2007 Williams Dep and Exhibit# (4) Exhibit Exhibit C - Fannie Mae's Interrogatory Responses# (5) Exhibit Exhibit D - Declaration of Richard Lawch# (6) Exhibit Exhibit E - 3-21-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (7) Exhibit Exhibit F - 5-7-2007 Williams Deposition and Exhibit# (8) Exhibit Exhibit G - DC Certificate# (9) Exhibit Exhibit H - Jones Deposition and Exhibits# (10) Exhibit Exhibit I - CAM Amended Complaint# (11) Exhibit Exhibit J - CAM Dismissal Order# (12) Exhibit Exhibit K - Williams Interrogatory Responses# (13) Exhibit Exhibit L - 3-17-2003 Williams Deposition# (14) Exhibit Exhibit M - DC License Document# (15) Exhibit Exhibit N - Draft Complaint# (16) Exhibit Exhibit O - 5-5-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (17) Exhibit Exhibit P - 5-6-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (18) Exhibit Exhibit Q - Westover Declaration# (19) Exhibit Exhibit R - Production Document# (20) Exhibit Exhibit S - Ott Deposition Excerpts# (21) Exhibit Exhibit T - Production Document# (22) Affidavit Declaration of K Grundeman# (23) Statement of Facts Statement of Undisputed Facts# (24) Text of Proposed Order # (25) Certificate of Service)(Goldfrank, Sarah)
Who is involved
- FANNIE MAE
- WILLIAMS
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its subsidiary “Sullivan Company” appears in a filing in this case.
…recruited away by another firm known as John 19 F. Sullivan Company in Philadelphia, 20 Pennsylvania. 21 Q.…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 07, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
4 page(s), 3,250 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-12 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1of4 EXHIBIT J Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Docurnent33-12 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 4 » TA Leon Distal) GF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION CAM FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., PLAINTIFF VS CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:01cv314GuRo ~. GENERAL STAR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY COMPANY; GENERAL STAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY; GENERAL RE CORPORATION; GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION; CRUMP INSURANCE SERVICES OF MEMPHIS, INC.; CRAIG OTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT OF GENERAL STAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE) DEFENDANTS AND COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ASSOCIATION (“FANNIE MAE”) VS. | COUNTER-DEFENDANT CAM FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. , ORDER Considering the Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by plaintiff, CAM Financial Services, Inc. (“CAM”), and defendant, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), by and through their attorneys, who have jointly moved the Court for an Order of Dismissal pursuant to the provisions of FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), dismissing with prejudice the claims herein, and the Court having received and considered the Motion and the evidence adduced in support thereof, and finding that the motion is well taken, and that the relief sought therein should be granted, counsel for the parties, having executed an Arbitration Agreement, agreeing to submit the remaining claims in this matter to binding arbitration, and the parties 524466.2 Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document33-12 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 4 having agreed to a dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims, in anticipation of the pending | arbitration. Ir IS THEREFORE ORDERED: L -- That the captioned matter is hereby dismissed, i in its entirety, with prejudice; and 2. That each party shall bear its own costs relative to the dismissal entered hereby. - - “80 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this Cha of “CE Cer rrGex2004. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PREPARED BY AND APPROVED: Signature Affixed GERARD E. WIMBERLY, JR. (MS #43132) ° McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC 643 Magazine Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 Phone: (504) 586-1200 ax: (504) 596-2800 Attomeys for Fannie Mae Lumpkin & Reeves, PLLO 160 Main Strect Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 “Attorneys for CAM Financial Services, Inc. Case 1:05-cv-01403-JDB Document 33-12 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4 of 4 having agreed to a dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims, in anticipation of the pending arbitration. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That the captioned matter is hereby dismissed, in its entirety, with prejudice; and 2. That each party shall bear its own costs relative to the dismissal entered hereby. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this day of , 2004. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PREPARED BY AND APPROVED: ES E. WIMBERLY, AL, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC 643 Magazine Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 Phone: (504) 586-1200 Fax: (504) 596-2800 Attorneys for Fannie Mae APPROVED: JAMES R. REEVES, JR. (MS #9519) Lumpkin & Reeves, PLLC 160 Main Street Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 Attorneys for CAM Financial Services, Inc. 524466.2