Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #17: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Stay all Other Deadlines by Lancium LLC
Case: Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. txwd · 6:23-cv-00344
filed May 10, 2023
What this document is
Docket entry #17 · filed September 21, 2023
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Stay all Other Deadlines by Lancium LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order)(Ortega, Francisco)
Who is involved
- Lancium LLC
- U.S. Data King Mountain LLC
- U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc.
- U.S. Mining Infrastructure Operations, LLC
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Marathon Digital: its name “Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.” appears in a filing in this case.
…(“MARA Order Form”), each by and between Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (“MARA”) and TZRC KM (the “MARA Lien”);…
- Hut 8: its former name “Hut 8 Mining Corp.” appears in a filing in this case.
…address activities, events or developments that Hut 8 Mining Corp. (“Hut 8”) expects or anticipates will or…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 16, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,412 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 6:23-cv-00344-KC Document 17-1 Filed 09/21/23 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO DIVISION
LANCIUM LLC,
Plaintiff, Case No. 6:23-cv-00344-KC
v.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
U.S. DATA MINING GROUP, INC.
(D/B/A US BITCOIN),
U.S. MINING INFRASTRUCTURE
OPERATIONS, LLC, and
U.S. DATA KING MOUNTAIN LLC,
Defendants.
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND STAY OF ALL OTHER
DEADLINES
WHEREFORE, the Court has considered the Parties’ Joint Motion for Extension of
Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and Stay of All Other Deadlines (the
“Motion”). The Court, being well-advised, finds the Motion should be GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to answer, move, or
otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended up to and including January 15, 2024.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case and all deadlines are stayed until January 15,
2024.
SIGNED this day of , 2023.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
