jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved November 07, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE — Entry #33: MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER

Case: WILLIAMS v. FANNIE MAE dcd · 1:05-cv-01483

filed July 28, 2005

What this document is

Docket entry #33 · filed June 21, 2007

MOTION for Summary Judgment by FANNIE MAE, RICHARD LAWCH, GRACE HUERSCHER (Attachments: # (1) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment# (2) Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Grace Huebscher and Deposition Excerpts# (3) Exhibit Exhibit B - 3-28-2007 Williams Dep and Exhibit# (4) Exhibit Exhibit C - Fannie Mae's Interrogatory Responses# (5) Exhibit Exhibit D - Declaration of Richard Lawch# (6) Exhibit Exhibit E - 3-21-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (7) Exhibit Exhibit F - 5-7-2007 Williams Deposition and Exhibit# (8) Exhibit Exhibit G - DC Certificate# (9) Exhibit Exhibit H - Jones Deposition and Exhibits# (10) Exhibit Exhibit I - CAM Amended Complaint# (11) Exhibit Exhibit J - CAM Dismissal Order# (12) Exhibit Exhibit K - Williams Interrogatory Responses# (13) Exhibit Exhibit L - 3-17-2003 Williams Deposition# (14) Exhibit Exhibit M - DC License Document# (15) Exhibit Exhibit N - Draft Complaint# (16) Exhibit Exhibit O - 5-5-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (17) Exhibit Exhibit P - 5-6-2003 Williams Deposition Excerpts# (18) Exhibit Exhibit Q - Westover Declaration# (19) Exhibit Exhibit R - Production Document# (20) Exhibit Exhibit S - Ott Deposition Excerpts# (21) Exhibit Exhibit T - Production Document# (22) Affidavit Declaration of K Grundeman# (23) Statement of Facts Statement of Undisputed Facts# (24) Text of Proposed Order # (25) Certificate of Service)(Goldfrank, Sarah)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 07, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.116226/gov.uscourts.dcd.116226.33.13.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2007-06-21 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-11-07 06:51:23.463608-05:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
310893
SHA-256
2c63d589839b19d0224921408fb51ccd13b65e02187c45a26b55399b015c97ef

Document text

12 page(s), 12,221 characters, read from page images by OCR, so expect some character errors · plain text.

Full text
Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-14 ~~ Filed 06/21/2007 Page1of12

EXHIBIT L


Case 1:05-cv-01483-JDB Document 33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 — Page 2 of t2 |

are IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
3 Southern Division
ees xX

5 CAM FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,

6 Plaintiff, : Case No.

7 Vz > 1:01cv314BrR

8 GENERAL STAR NATIONAL INSURANCE

9 COMPANY; GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY

10 COMPANY; GENERAL STAR MANAGEMENT
11 COMPANY, GENERAL RE CORPORATION:

12 GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION;

13 CRUMP INSURANCE SERVICES OF MEMPHIS:
14 INC.; CRAIG OTT, INDIVIDUALLY AND :

15 IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS:

16 VICE PRESIDENT OF GENERAL STAR

17 MANAGEMENT COMPANY; FEDERAL NATIONAL:
18 MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), :

19 Defendants.

20 ------------------ x

21 Washington, D.C.

22 Monday, March 17, 2003

23 Videotaped deposition of MARIALICE

24 WILLIAMS, a witness herein, called for examination by

25 counsel for Defendant Fannie Mae, in the above-

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 1

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001532


Case 4:05-ev-01483-JDB Document 33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page dofiz |

00002
1 entitled matter, pursuant to subpoena, the witness

2 being duly sworn by SUSAN L. CIMINELLI, a Notary
3 Public in and for the District of Columbia, taken at

4 the offices of Steptoe & Johnson, 1330 Connecticut

5 Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., at 1:23 p.m., Monday,
6 March 17, 2003, and the proceedings being taken down
7 by Stenotype by SUSAN L. CIMINELLI, CRR, RPR, and
8 transcribed under her direction.

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 2

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001533


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Doacument33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4 of i2

00037
1 QQ. Memorandum, memoranda, do you keep copies

2 of memoranda?

3 A. Yes.

4 Q. Business reports, that kind of thing? If

> you would, just please describe for me. —

6 <A. Yes. And everything --

7  Q.. The kinds of things you keep?

8 A. Everything that I kept in my office that

9 related to Fannie Mae was sent to you pursuant to a
10 subpoena, and unfortunately, I had a computer crash;
11 and at the time I had the computer crash, I was

12 talking to someone on the telephone who knows I had
13 that crash and much, most of the material in my

14 computer was lost and I had to get a brand-new

15 computer. I sent my hard drive out to a maintenance
16 person to attempt to recover what were thousands of
17 documents that I thought were important, and I was
18 not able to retrieve them.

19 Q. Okay. Ms. Williams, that's a good segue

20 into my next couple of questions about the return on
21 your subpoena. Exhibit, the second exhibit, Exhibit
22 2 is the subpoena and then attached to it is an

23 Exhibit A. If you would turn to that, please.

24 =A. Exhibit A.

25  Q. Are you there? Just for the record --

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 37

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001568


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Dacument33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 5 of iz

00088
1 honest effort on Fannie Mae's part to do business

2 with me, since I had actually come up with the

3 concept and closed the first transactions that

4 involved credit risk insurance.

5 Every person that I know who has left

6 Fannie Mae who has done something of that nature has
7 always been rewarded with an opportunity to work with
8 Fannie Mae when they were not fired from their

9 position.

10 Therefore, my thought it was very

11 important --

12 BY MR. WIMBERLY:

13. Q. Ms. Williams, I'm going to object to your

14 answer as nonresponsive to the question.

15 A. You asked me why I sent it and I am

16 telling you why I sent it. Because I spent

17 considerable amount of money and time trying to

18 honestly do business with Fannie Mae and it was clear
19 from this message that they were not doing anything
20 but taking my time and attention and using that with
21 other people.

22 That's why I sent it to Bob. Because I

23 knew that Craig Ott, the person who was referred to
24 in this letter, in this e-mail, was a person that I

25 had introduced to Fannie Mae through CAM Financial

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 88

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001619


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Doacument33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 6 of 12

00091
1 Q. Then why did she send it to you?

2 A. Because she recognized that I had spent a

3 great deal of time and effort at Fannie Mae.

4 Including signing a confidentiality agreement with

5 them, and had provided them with the great deal of
6 information, had a consultant fly in from Canada to
7 meet with them, had customers of Fannie Mae, DUS
8 customers, you name them, they were my customers,
9 wanting me to do business with Fannie Mae.

10 Betty knew about the confidential

11 relationship, I mean knew about the confidentiality
12 agreements with all of the people that Bob Jones

13 brought into Fannie Mae, and I’m certain she was as
14 shocked as I was when I read it. And I, I doubt

15. seriously that there is anybody in this room who

16 wouldn't have done the same thing under the

17 circumstances.

18 Q. Did she send you any other documents from
19 Fannie Mae after you left Fannie Mae in July 1998?
20 A. Betty has never sent me anything related

21 to her work whatsoever. We share prayers. We share
22 jokes. We do not share information about Fannie Mae
23 because after this, it was clear that Fannie Mae was
24 not going to do business with me and J had to find

25 work. This was no reason for her to send anything

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 91

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001622


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 7 of 12

00094
1 one and only e-mail I ever received from her that had

2 anything to do with business and she sent me this one
3 because it's pretty clear from this e-mail that I was

4 not going to be given the same opportunity as

5 everyone else was being given to do this.

6 Q. Did you talk to anyone about this e-mail

7 after you got it?

8 A. Yes,Idid. Italked to Bob Jones and _

9 said forget all the stuff I'm trying to do with

10 Fannie Mae because it's obvious they are not going to
11 give me any business so maybe you might want to try
12 to get some from them.

13 Q. When did you talk to Bob Jones?

14 A. Idon't recall. As soon as probably I got

15 this e-mail. It's pretty shocking when you spent

16 almost two hundred and some thousand dollars building
17 a business to suddenly one day walk in the door and
18 no you don't have ding, after lies and lies and lies

19 and confidentiality and being asked if you wanted to
20 do it, and then being crapped on in the midst of all

21 of it.

22 QQ. And what did Mr. Jones say to you when you
23 told him about this?

24 A. He said I'm not surprised.

25  Q. Tell me everything he said to you about

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 94

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001625


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Doacument33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page Gof 12

00102
1 MS. WILLIAMS: Marialice, that's all

2 right. Do you have a question outstanding?
3 BY MR. WIMBERLY:
4 QQ. Let me check.

3 (Witness laughing.)
6 THE WITNESS: I can tell you you don't.
7 MR. WIMBERLY: Well, then let me -- oh,

8 no, Ido. There is no -- Ido have a question. No.
9 No. I do have a question pending. And that is, is
10 it not correct to say there is no, there is no

11 absolute decision here to reject your proposal?

12 MR. WISER: Object to the form of the

13 question.

14 THE WITNESS: That is incorrect. You are
15 incorrect.

16 BY MR. WIMBERLY:

17. = Q._—s And why am I incorrect?

18 A. Because you cannot read.

19 Q. Well, please help me read. Where is it
20 categorically decided that Fannie Mae is rejecting
21 your proposal?

22 MR. WISER: Object to the form of the

23 question.

24 THE WITNESS: In the context of this

25 e-mail. That is open to obviously a different

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 102

‘CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001633


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 9 of 12

00104
1 Q. Okay. Okay. And can -- did he call you?

2 Or did you call him?

3 <A. For?

4 Q. To tell him about this e-mail?

5 A. I forwarded it to Bob Jones much earlier.
6  Q. Oh. You had already given it to him? You
7 had forwarded it to him before February 2002?

8 <A. [believe so.

9 Q. When?

10 A. Idon't recall. It should say here

11 somewhere, I guess. I don't remember when I told
12 him, frankly.

13. =+Q. You don't disagree there is nothing in

14 this document that's Exhibit 5 that indicates that
15 you forwarded it to Mr. Jones at this time, so your
16 testimony is that you forwarded it to him at some
17 other time?

18 MR. WISER: Object to the form of the

19 question.

20 THE WITNESS: I thought -- I could be

21 incorrect. I, I don't remember.

22 BY MR. WIMBERLY:

23 Q. Do you have a general recollection?

24 MR. WISER: Object to the form of the

25 question.

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 104

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001635


Case 1:05-cv-01483-IDB Document 33-14 Filed O6/21/2007 Page 10012

00107
1 said: "Yes, we're trying to."

2 Q. When did that occur? ©

3 A. That occurred, and Fannie Mae I'm sure

4 will know in their records from when I had an

5 appointment with them, when I went in to speak with
6 Richard, about doing this business.

7 QQ. But in your own recollection, when did it

8 occur?

9 MR. WISER: I object to the form of the

10 question.

11 THE WITNESS: Sometime between 1998 and
12 1994.

13 MS. WILLIAMS: 1998 and -- .

14 THE WITNESS: 1998 and -- 1998 and -- when

15 did I leave there, I can’t even remember now. Was it
16 '98, and 2001.

17 BY MR. WIMBERLY:

18 Q. Was it before June 4, 2001?

19 MR. WISER: Object to the form of the

20 question.

21 THE WITNESS: I believe it was.

22 BY MR. WIMBERLY:

23 Q. Was it shortly before?

24 A. It was before this memo was written

25 because if I had already have known this memo was

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 107

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001638


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document33-14 Filed 06/21/2007 Page il of ie

00108 .
1 written I certainly would not have taken more trouble

2 todo more work for free for Fannie Mae for nothing. |
3 QQ. Why did you resend it then to Mr. Jones in

4 February 2002?

5 A. I don't know, don't recall.

6 MR. WISER: Object to the form of the
7 question.
3 BY MR. WIMBERLY:

9  Q. Did somebody ask you to do that?
10. A. I don't recall.

11 Q. You are familiar with Mr. Nick Wiser?

12 A. Yes, Iam.

13, Q. Who has been relatively vocal today?

14. A. Am I familiar with Mr. Wiser?

15 Q. Yes, ma'am?

16 A. Yes, Iam.

17. = Q._-~ And how are you familiar with Mr. Wiser?

18 A. I'm familiar with Mr. Wiser because he
19 represents Bob Jones.

20. Q. How long have you known Mr. Wiser?
21 A. I don't recall exactly.

22 Q. You have a general recollection?

23. =A. After 1998 and before today.

24 QQ. Ms. Williams, I appreciate that it's

25 difficult to be sitting here answering questions, but

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 108

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001639


Case 1:05-cv-01463-JDB Document 33-14 ried 06/21/2007 Page iZof le

00121
1 no one more surreptitious than the people I worked

2 with at Fannie Mae, who stole my concept —

3 Q. Ms. Williams?

4 A. - would never let me have an award to

5 myself because --

6 Q. Move to strike.

7 A. -- Richard Lawch hated me.

8 Q. Move to strike the prior answer.

9 A. And told me he was going to get around CAM
10 the minute J walked out the door. And he did. _

11 Q. Ms. Williams let's get --

12 A. Now, that's surreptitious.

13. Q. Let's get back to the questions about this

14 e-mail. Again, I'm trying to explain what I'm

15 reading in this e-mail.

16 <A. And I'm trying to explain to you that when

17 I got this e-mail J did not know about the lawsuit

18 and Fannie Mae was not a party. So stop referring to
19 it as me and Fannie Mae. Fannie Mae was not involved
20 in this lawsuit when I gave my statement. This, this
21 was sent to me because I was being screwed.

22 Q. Isn't it, but isn't it a fact,

23 Ms. Williams, based on your understanding of Fannie
24 Mae's policies on confidential information, that you

25 thought Betty Dance was giving you confidential

March 17, 2003 FM of MAW Page 121

CONFIDENTIAL
FNMA.MBW.001652