Giraudon v. Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. — Entry #64: ORDER vacating 63 Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Lead Plaintiff's Consolidated Class Action Complaint
Case: Giraudon v. Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. mdd · 1:25-cv-00182
filed January 17, 2025
What this document is
Docket entry #64 · filed October 16, 2025
ORDER vacating 63 Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Lead Plaintiff's Consolidated Class Action Complaint; REOPENING CASE; directing that RRS may file an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by 10/21/2025, and Defendants may file a Reply by 11/20/2025. Signed by Chief Judge George Levi Russell, III on 10/16/2025. (bg3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 10/16/2025)
Who is involved
- Alain Giraudon
- Alan D. Gold
- Ben Regin
- Catherine Hastings
- City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
- David Smith
- Dr. Richard A. Blocker
- Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
- Kelly R. Johnson
- Paul E. Smithers
- Utility Board Retirement System City of Key West
- Yolanda Castaneda
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its former name “FLIGHT SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES INC” appears in a filing in this case.
…Co-Lead Counsel. $1.2 million. • Flight Safety Technologies, Inc., (D. Conn.). Rosen Lead Counsel. $1…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 21, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
2 page(s), 2,349 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 1:25-cv-00182-GLR Document 64 Filed 10/16/25 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
ALAIN GIRAUDON, individually and *
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
*
Plaintiffs,
* Civil Action No. GLR-25-182
v.
*
INNOVATIVE INDUSTRIAL
PROPERTIES, INC., et al., *
Defendants. *
***
ORDER
On October 16, 2025, the Court issued an Order granting Defendants Innovative
Industrial Properties, Inc., Alan Gold, Paul Smithers, David Smith, Benjamin C. Regin,
and Catherine Hastings’ Motion to Dismiss Lead Plaintiff’s Consolidated Class Action
Complaint (ECF No. 60) as unopposed. Shortly thereafter, the Court received a phone call
from counsel for Lead Plaintiff City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
(“RRS”), informing the Court that, under the Court’s April 25, 2025 Scheduling Order,
RRS’s Opposition is due on October 21, 2025 rather than September 5, 2025, as would be
the case under the Local Rules. (See Sched. Order at 1, ECF No. 41).
Accordingly, it is this 16th day of October, 2025, by the United States District Court
for the District of Maryland, hereby:
ORDERED that the Court’s Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Lead
Plaintiff’s Consolidated Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 63) is VACATED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall REOPEN this case;
Case 1:25-cv-00182-GLR Document 64 Filed 10/16/25 Page 2 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that RRS may FILE an Opposition to the Motion to
Dismiss by October 21, 2025, and Defendants may FILE a Reply by November 20, 2025;
and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall PROVIDE a copy of this Order to
all counsel of record.
____________/s/________________
George L. Russell, III
Chief United States District Judge
2