DOE 1 v. GitHub, Inc. — Entry #297: MANDATE of USCA as to 283 Petition for Permission to Appeal
Case: DOE 1 v. GitHub, Inc. cand · 4:22-cv-06823
filed November 03, 2022
What this document is
Docket entry #297 · filed October 08, 2026
MANDATE of USCA as to 283 Petition for Permission to Appeal. Case Number 24-6136 Ninth Circuit (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2026) (Entered: 10/08/2026)
Who is involved
- GitHub, Inc.
- J. DOE 1
- J. DOE 2
- J. Doe 3
- J. Doe 4
- J. Doe 5
- Microsoft Corporation
- OAI CORPORATION,
- OPENAI GLOBAL, LLC
- OpenAI GP, L.L.C.
- OPENAI HOLDCO, LLC
- OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC
- OPENAI INVESTMENT
- OPENAI INVESTMENT LLC
- OpenAI OpCo, L.L.C.
- OpenAI Startup Fund GP I, L.L.C.
- OpenAI Startup Fund I, L.P.
- OpenAI Startup Fund Management, LLC
- OPENAI STARTUP FUND SPV GP I, L.L.C.
- OPENAI STARTUP FUND SPV I, L.P
- OpenAI, Inc.
- OPENAI, L.L.C.
- OpenAI, L.P.
Why we have it
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
…Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 962 F. Supp. 2d 1146, 1158 (N.D. Cal. 2013)…
A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 11, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.
Document text
1 page(s), 1,725 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.
Full text
Case 4:22-cv-06823-JST Document 297 Filed 10/08/26 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 8 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
J. DOE, 1 and J. DOE, 2-5, individually and No. 24-7700
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
D.C. No.
4:22-cv-06823-JST
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
Northern District of California,
v. Oakland
GITHUB, INC., a Delaware corporation; et MANDATE FILED
al., Oct 08 2026
Defendants - Appellees. CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO
The judgment of this Court, entered September 16, 2026, takes effect this
date.
This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to
Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
FOR THE COURT:
MOLLY C. DWYER
CLERK OF COURT