jain.com
Public record. We host this document directly; the copy served here does not depend on any third party. Retrieved October 26, 2026.
Read the documentAlso at archive.org ↗

Atanasoff v. Bradford — Entry #33: ORDER APPROVING ECF No

Case: Atanasoff v. Bradford nvd · 2:23-cv-00358

filed March 07, 2023

What this document is

Docket entry #33 · filed June 05, 2023

ORDER APPROVING ECF No. 32 Stipulation to Reset Briefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response due by 6/12/2023. Defendants' Reply due by 7/7/2023 as to ECF No. 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 6/5/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)

Who is involved

Why we have it

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved October 26, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL
https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148/gov.uscourts.nvd.161148.33.0.pdf
Kind
court_filing
Publisher
RECAP
Published
2023-06-05 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved
2026-10-26 06:50:18.942755-04:00
HTTP status
200
MIME
application/pdf
Bytes
235914
SHA-256
0ac97d23daede0ad87039724f6f82eeb1f1a30ac706913bf5ad35c370391315a

Document text

3 page(s), 4,536 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text
Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 1 of 3


 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 8                                     DISTRICT OF NEVADA

 9   ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Behalf of
     CLEANSPARK, INC.,
10                   Plaintiff,                        Case No.: 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW
11   v.                                                (Removal from District Court, Clark County,
12                                                     Nevada, Case No. A-23-866492-C)
     ZACHARY K. BRADFORD,
13   S. MATTHEW SCHULTZ, ROGER P.
     BEYNON, LARRY MCNEILL, and THOMAS
14   L. WOOD,                                          ORDER APPROVING
15                          Defendants,                STIPULATION TO RESET
16                                                     BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
     -and-                                             MOTION TO DISMISS
17
     CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation,
18
                            Nominal Defendant.
19

20           Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff
21   CleanSpark, Inc. (“CleanSpark”) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz,
22   Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the “Individual Defendants”), and Nominal
23   Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants, “Defendants”) (collectively,
24   with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the
25   following stipulation and proposed order:
26           WHEREAS, on April 25, 2023 the Court granted the Stipulation to Set Briefing
27   Schedule for Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21)(the “Scheduling Order”);
28           WHEREAS, on May 5, 2023, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss or, in the
                                                   1


     Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 2 of 3


 1   Alternative, to Stay the Action (the “Motion to Dismiss”) in accordance with the Scheduling

 2   Order; and

 3          WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the Motion

 4   to Dismiss is currently June 5, 2023; and

 5          WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Defendants’ deadline to reply in support

 6   of the Motion to Dismiss is currently June 26, 2023

 7          WHEREAS, the parties now seek a short additional extension for both Plaintiff’s

 8   opposition and Defendants’ subsequent reply.

 9          NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties

10   hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

11          1.        Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the Motion to Dismiss is extended until on or before

12   June 12, 2023.

13          2.        Defendants’ deadline to reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss is extended

14   until on or before July 7, 2023.

15          3.        Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights.

16

17   DATED: June 1, 2023                                    DATED: June 1, 2023
18
     FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP                                     ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.
19
     s/ Mark J. Connot                                       s/ Catherine Hernandez
20   MARK J. CONNOT (10010)                                 JOHN P. ALDRICH (6877)
     COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186)                             CATHERINE HERNANDEZ (8410)
21   1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700                    7866 West Sahara Avenue
22   Las Vegas, NV 89135                                    Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
     mconnot@foxrothschild.com                              jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com
23   cmccarty@foxrothschild.com                             chernandez@johnaldrichlawfirm.com
     Counsel for Defendants                                 Counsel for Plaintiff
24

25

26

27

28
                                                        2


     Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 3 of 3


 1                                      IT IS SO ORDERED.
 2

 3                                      _____________________________________
                                        Anne R. Traum
 4                                      United States District Court Judge

 5                                      DATED: June 5, 2023
 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
                                          3