Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 ERIC ATANASOFF, Derivatively on Behalf of CLEANSPARK, INC., 10 Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW 11 v. (Removal from District Court, Clark County, 12 Nevada, Case No. A-23-866492-C) ZACHARY K. BRADFORD, 13 S. MATTHEW SCHULTZ, ROGER P. BEYNON, LARRY MCNEILL, and THOMAS 14 L. WOOD, ORDER APPROVING 15 Defendants, STIPULATION TO RESET 16 BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR -and- MOTION TO DISMISS 17 CLEANSPARK, INC., a Nevada Corporation, 18 Nominal Defendant. 19 20 Plaintiff Eric Atanasoff (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Plaintiff 21 CleanSpark, Inc. (“CleanSpark”) and Defendants Zachary K. Bradford, S. Matthew Schultz, 22 Larry McNeill, Thomas L. Wood, Roger P. Beynon (the “Individual Defendants”), and Nominal 23 Defendant CleanSpark (together with the Individual Defendants, “Defendants”) (collectively, 24 with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the 25 following stipulation and proposed order: 26 WHEREAS, on April 25, 2023 the Court granted the Stipulation to Set Briefing 27 Schedule for Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21)(the “Scheduling Order”); 28 WHEREAS, on May 5, 2023, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss or, in the 1 Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 2 of 3 1 Alternative, to Stay the Action (the “Motion to Dismiss”) in accordance with the Scheduling 2 Order; and 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the Motion 4 to Dismiss is currently June 5, 2023; and 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Defendants’ deadline to reply in support 6 of the Motion to Dismiss is currently June 26, 2023 7 WHEREAS, the parties now seek a short additional extension for both Plaintiff’s 8 opposition and Defendants’ subsequent reply. 9 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties 10 hereto, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: 11 1. Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the Motion to Dismiss is extended until on or before 12 June 12, 2023. 13 2. Defendants’ deadline to reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss is extended 14 until on or before July 7, 2023. 15 3. Other than as agreed herein, the Parties reserve all rights. 16 17 DATED: June 1, 2023 DATED: June 1, 2023 18 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD. 19 s/ Mark J. Connot s/ Catherine Hernandez 20 MARK J. CONNOT (10010) JOHN P. ALDRICH (6877) COLLEEN E. MCCARTY (13186) CATHERINE HERNANDEZ (8410) 21 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 700 7866 West Sahara Avenue 22 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 mconnot@foxrothschild.com jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com 23 cmccarty@foxrothschild.com chernandez@johnaldrichlawfirm.com Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiff 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case 2:23-cv-00358-ART-BNW Document 33 Filed 06/05/23 Page 3 of 3 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 _____________________________________ Anne R. Traum 4 United States District Court Judge 5 DATED: June 5, 2023 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3