Bencomo v. County of Sacramento
caed · 2:23-cv-00440
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
…order in that action.1 See Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., No. 12-cv-01521- 21 1 In his reply…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Bencomo | party | |
| County of Sacramento | party |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=66977699&page_size=40
#- · 2024-06-28
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-06-04
(no description on the docket)
#47 · 2024-05-23
(no description on the docket)
#45 · 2024-05-20
(no description on the docket)
#46 · 2024-05-20
(no description on the docket)
#44 · 2024-05-16
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/16/2024 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 42 Request to Seal. The clerk is DIRECTED to SEAL 22 Motion for Leave to Amend, 24 Opposition to Motion, 27 First Amended Complaint, and 29 Motion to Dismiss. Within 7 days from the date of this order, the parties are DIRECTED to file redacted versions of the documents identified in the order. (Woodson, A) Read the filing
#43 · 2024-05-06
(no description on the docket)
#42 · 2024-05-03
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-05-01
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-04-17
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-04-11
(no description on the docket)
#37 · 2024-04-04
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 4/4/2024. (Clemente Licea, O)
#- · 2024-03-18
(no description on the docket)
#33 · 2024-03-07
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 03/06/24. (Benson, A.)
#32 · 2024-03-04
(no description on the docket)
#30 · 2024-02-22
(no description on the docket)
#29 · 2024-02-22
(no description on the docket)
#28 · 2024-02-09
(no description on the docket)
#27 · 2024-02-08
(no description on the docket)
#26 · 2024-02-01
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/31/24 GRANTING 22 Motion to Amend the Complaint, DIRECTING Plaintiff to file the first amended complaint within 7 days from the date of this order, and DENYING 9 Motion to Dismiss, as moot. (Licea Chavez, V)