Carol Price v. Converse, Inc.
cacd · 2:24-cv-08091
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
…............... 28 14 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., 962 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (N.D. Cal. 2013)…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| DOES | Defendant | |
| Converse, Inc. | Defendant | , , |
| Carol Price | Plaintiff | , , , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=69182293&page_size=40
#70 · 2026-06-16
(no description on the docket)
#69 · 2026-02-18
(no description on the docket)
#68 · 2026-02-17
(no description on the docket)
#67 · 2026-01-12
(no description on the docket)
#66 · 2025-12-29
(no description on the docket)
#59 · 2025-12-04
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION OF DEFENDANT CONVERSE INC. TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 55 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court finds that the Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint currently scheduled for hearing on December 5, 2025, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, this motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. The court expects the parties to continue litigating this action diligently, while awaiting the court's ruling on this motion. No appearances are
#65 · 2025-12-23
Notice Regarding Application to Tax Costs filed by Defendant Converse, Inc. re: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Carol Price 64 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samuel C. Cortina in Support of Defendant Converse Inc.'s Notice Regarding Application to Tax Costs, # 2 Exhibit A - Price State Court Complaint, # 3 Exhibit B - Dismissal of State Court Complaint)(Roth, Michael) (Entered: 12/23/2025)
#64 · 2025-12-23
APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Carol Price filed by Defendant Converse, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Tab 5A - Deposition Invoice, # 2 Tab 5B - Deposition Invoice) (Roth, Michael) (Entered: 12/23/2025)
#63 · 2025-12-09
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Carol Price. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Tauler, Robert) (Entered: 12/09/2025)
#62 · 2025-12-08
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick granting in part and denying in part 56 Defendant's Motion to Compel Disclosures and Production of Documents from Plaintiff Carol Price. (See document for details) (vmun) (Entered: 12/08/2025)
#61 · 2025-12-08
SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Disclosures and Production of Documents from Plaintiff Carol Price 56 filed by Plaintiff Carol Price. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit)(Kumar, Narain) (Entered: 12/08/2025)
#60 · 2025-12-05
SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Disclosures and Production of Documents from Plaintiff Carol Price 56 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Pursuant to Local Rule 37-2.3 filed by Defendant Converse, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration (Supplemental) of Samuel C. Cortina in Support of Defendant Converse Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Pursuant to Local Rule 37-2.3, # 2 Exhibit N - Excerpts of Plaintiff's Deposition Transcript, # 3 Exhibit O - October 2, 2025 Email, # 4 Exhibit P - Errata Sheet)(Roth, Michael) (Entered: 12/05/2025)
#- · 2025-12-04
(no description on the docket)
#58 · 2025-11-21
REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint 55 filed by Defendant Converse, Inc.. (Roth, Michael) (Entered: 11/21/2025)
#57 · 2025-11-15
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint 55 filed by Plaintiff Carol Price. (Kumar, Narain) (Entered: 11/15/2025)
#56 · 2025-11-12
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Disclosures and Production of Documents from Plaintiff Carol Price filed by Defendant Converse, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/19/2025 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation Re: Defendant Converse Inc.'s Motion to Compel Disclosures and Production of Documents from Plaintiff Carol Price, # 2 Declaration of Samuel C. Cortina in Support of Defendant Converse Inc.'s Motion to Compel, # 3 Exhibit A - Converse's First Set of RFPs to Plaintiff, # 4 Exhibit B - Converse's First Set of ROGs to Plaintiff, # 5 Ex
#55 · 2025-11-04
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Converse, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/5/2025 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Michael D. Roth in Support of Converse Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 1 - Excerpts of Plaintiff Carol Price's Deposition, # 3 Exhibit 2 - Excerpts of Converse's Corp. Designee Deposition, # 4 Exhibit 3 - 06/06/25 Plaintiff's Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories, # 5 Exhibit 4 - 10/27/25 Plaintiff's Responses and Objecti
#40 · 2025-05-02
SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re: Plaintiff's First MOTION to Compel Productions, Supplemental and Compliant Discovery Responses. 38 The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel scheduled on May 23, 2025 at 9:30 AM will be held in Courtroom 750, Roybal Federal Building, 255 E. Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA before Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vmun) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 05/02/2025)
#34 · 2025-01-29
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION OF DEFENDANT CONVERSE INC. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 22 UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court finds that the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint currently scheduled for hearing on January 31, 2025 is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, this motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. The court expects the parties to continue litigating this action diligently, while awaiting the court's ruling on this motion. No a
#31 · 2025-01-28
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the court VACATES the January 31, 2025, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/28/2025)