Sosa v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
cand · 3:25-cv-01310
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Nebius: its former name “Yandex N.V.” appears in a filing in this case.
….............16 2 3 Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V., No. C 12-01521 WHA, 2013 WL 1899851…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc. | Defendant | , , , , , , |
| YouTube | Defendant | , , , , , |
| Defendant | , , , , , , , | |
| AT&T | Defendant | |
| Andrew Dayne Sosa, I | Plaintiff | , , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=69621964&page_size=40
#112 · 2026-10-13
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-10-13
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-09-24
(no description on the docket)
#110 · 2026-09-24
(no description on the docket)
#109 · 2026-09-23
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-08-17
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-07-22
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-06-29
(no description on the docket)
#106 · 2026-06-23
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-06-23
(no description on the docket)
#104 · 2026-06-15
(no description on the docket)
#103 · 2026-06-02
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-05-27
(no description on the docket)
#102 · 2026-05-26
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-05-22
(no description on the docket)
#100 · 2026-05-20
(no description on the docket)
#99 · 2026-05-19
(no description on the docket)
#98 · 2026-05-19
(no description on the docket)
#97 · 2026-05-05
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2026-05-03
(no description on the docket)