jain.com

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc.

nynd · 1:18-cv-00549

Cached from CourtListener API on November 08, 2026. jain.com does not require visitors to log into external services to view what we cite; this local page reflects the docket state at cache time.
Cached copy·CourtListener (login required)
Case name
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Filed
2018-05-08
Terminated
2024-03-18
Nature of suit
Patent
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Jurisdiction type
Federal Question
Assigned to
Brenda K. Sannes
Referred to
Therese Wiley Dancks

Why this case is on jain.com

We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:

Parties

PartyRole / typeAttorneys
Greg HartCounter Defendant, , , ,
Al LindsayConsol Defendant, , , ,
Amazon.com IncIn Re
Amazon.com, Inc.Defendant, Counter Claimant, , , , , , , , ,
CF Dynamic Advances LLCPlaintiff, Consol Plaintiff, Counter Defendant, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Rensselaer Polytechnic InstitutePlaintiff, Consol Plaintiff, Counter Defendant, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=6539117&page_size=40

#- · 2024-12-09
(no description on the docket)
#458 · 2024-12-04
(no description on the docket)
#457 · 2024-11-04
(no description on the docket)
#456 · 2024-10-04
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-09-05
(no description on the docket)
#449 · 2024-03-25
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-03-26
(no description on the docket)
#448 · 2024-03-22
(no description on the docket)
#446 · 2024-03-20
(no description on the docket)
#443 · 2024-03-18
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. No. 390 ), is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. No. 384 ), is GRANTED and Plaintiffs& #039; complaint, (Dkt. No. 1 ), is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the parties' related motions, (Dkt. Nos. 383 , 386 , 388 , 390 , 411 ), are DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to close Read the filing
#444 · 2024-03-18
(no description on the docket)
#440 · 2024-03-07
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-03-07
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-03-05
(no description on the docket)
#437 · 2024-02-26
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2024-02-13
(no description on the docket)
#435 · 2024-02-09
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2023-12-20
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2023-12-14
(no description on the docket)
#432 · 2023-12-07
TEXT ORDER: In anticipation of the scheduling of a settlement conference in this matter, the Court ORDERS the following: Not later than December 20, 2023, the parties shall submit directly to Judge Peebles' chambers a short, concise statement setting forth the material facts of the case, together with an indication of which if any are disputed; providing a synopsis of the parties' respective legal positions concerning any issues presented in the case; and outlining any settlement discussions which have occurred. This can be done by emailing the Judge's Courtroom Deputy at Rose_Pieklik@nynd.usc