Erwin v. Metalcraft of Mayville Inc
txnd · 3:23-cv-01561
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its name “Applied Digital Corporation” appears in a filing in this case.
…LLC 90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al 91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Metalcraft of Mayville Inc | Defendant | , , , , , |
| Albert Sidney Erwin | Plaintiff | , , |
| Karen Jean Erwin | Plaintiff | , , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67605404&page_size=40
#106 · 2026-04-20
(no description on the docket)
#90 · 2025-12-18
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-11-19
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-11-12
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-11-04
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-10-21
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2025-10-06
(no description on the docket)
#50 · 2025-04-24
REPLY filed by Metalcraft of Mayville Inc re: 49 Response/Objection (Riordan, Christopher) (Entered: 04/24/2025)
#49 · 2025-04-14
RESPONSE filed by Albert Sidney Erwin, Karen Jean Erwin re: 48 Appendix in Support, 47 Appendix in Support, 46 Objection to Findings and Recommendations (Ayres, Christopher) (Entered: 04/14/2025)
#48 · 2025-04-03
Appendix in Support filed by Metalcraft of Mayville Inc re 46 Objection to Findings and Recommendations (Riordan, Christopher) (Entered: 04/03/2025)
#47 · 2025-04-03
Appendix in Support filed by Metalcraft of Mayville Inc re 46 Objection to Findings and Recommendations (Riordan, Christopher) (Entered: 04/03/2025)
#46 · 2025-04-03
OBJECTION to 45 Findings and Recommendations . (Riordan, Christopher) (Entered: 04/03/2025)
#45 · 2025-03-20
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Because Plaintiffs have produced adequate evidence to raise a fact issue with respect to their strict product liability and negligence claims, Defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment should be DENIED, and Plaintiffs' claims should proceed to trial. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 3/20/2025) (twd) (Entered: 03/20/2025)
#44 · 2025-02-04
ELECTRONIC ORDER Resetting Trial Date. The Court sua sponte RESETS the trial of this matter and continues the related pretrial deadlines.The Court sets this matter for JURY trial on the Court's three-week docket beginning December 1, 2025. Any potential conflicts with this trial setting must be called to the attention of the Court in writing within ten (10) days from the date of this Order.The parties shall file their pretrial materials, as outlined in Paragraph 12 of the Scheduling Order, by November 10, 2025. Doc. No. 13 at 3. The parties shall make the disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P
#43 · 2025-01-29
Witness List by Metalcraft of Mayville Inc. (Riordan, Christopher) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
#42 · 2025-01-29
Exhibit List by Metalcraft of Mayville Inc. (Riordan, Christopher) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
#41 · 2025-01-29
Witness List by Karen Jean Erwin, Albert Sidney Erwin. (Ayres, Christopher) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
#40 · 2025-01-29
Exhibit List (Plaintiffs') by Karen Jean Erwin, Albert Sidney Erwin. (Ayres, Christopher) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
#39 · 2025-01-29
Plaintiffs' Pretrial Disclosures filed by Karen Jean Erwin, Albert Sidney Erwin. (Ayres, Christopher) (Entered: 01/29/2025)
#38 · 2025-01-29
Defendant's Federal Rule 26(a)(3)(A)-(B) Pretrial Disclosures filed by Metalcraft of Mayville Inc. (Riordan, Christopher) (Entered: 01/29/2025)