Botone v. Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company
txnd · 3:23-cv-02462
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its name “Applied Digital Corporation” appears in a filing in this case.
…LLC 90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al 91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Botone | party | |
| Unitrin Safeguard Insurance Company | party |
Docket entries showing 10 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=67995532&page_size=40
#25 · 2025-10-15
(no description on the docket)
#23 · 2025-08-05
(no description on the docket)
#21 · 2025-08-05
(no description on the docket)
#20 · 2025-06-02
(no description on the docket)
#17 · 2025-01-07
(no description on the docket)
#15 · 2024-08-23
Special Order No. 3-354: Effective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to Magistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters BW. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-354. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Brian W McKay on 8/23/2024) (rekc) Read the filing
#10 · 2023-12-12
(no description on the docket)
#11 · 2023-12-12
(no description on the docket)
#12 · 2023-12-12
(no description on the docket)
#5 · 2023-11-09
(no description on the docket)