Oldham v. State Farm Lloyds
txnd · 3:23-cv-02591
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Applied Digital: its name “Applied Digital Corporation” appears in a filing in this case.
…LLC 90 3:23-cv-01805-E McConnell v. Applied Digital Corporation et al 91 3:23-cv-01832-8 Doe v. Dallas…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Oldham | party | |
| State Farm Lloyds | party |
Docket entries showing 10 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=68048472&page_size=40
#23 · 2024-10-30
(no description on the docket)
#21 · 2024-10-17
(no description on the docket)
#19 · 2024-08-23
Special Order No. 3-354: Effective August 23, 2024, the cases listed on Exhibit A to this order are transferred to Magistrate Judge Brian McKay and shall henceforth carry the suffix letters BW. This case has been reassigned pursuant to Special Order No. 3-354. (The clerk has mailed a copy to all non-ECF users.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Brian W McKay on 8/23/2024) (rekc) Read the filing
#18 · 2024-07-18
(no description on the docket)
#14 · 2024-01-04
(no description on the docket)
#12 · 2023-12-28
(no description on the docket)
#13 · 2023-12-28
(no description on the docket)
#- · 2023-12-07
(no description on the docket)
#4 · 2023-11-30
(no description on the docket)
#5 · 2023-11-30
(no description on the docket)