Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
nyed · 1:24-cv-05347
Why this case is on jain.com
We follow this case because it names a company we track, although that company is not a party:
- Hut 8: its name “Hut 8 Corp.” appears in a filing in this case.
…standards, where accompanied by disclosures); In re Hut 8 Corp. Sec. Litig., No. 24-CV-0904 (VM), 2025 WL 2636150…
Parties
| Party | Role / type | Attorneys |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Daniels | Movant | , |
| Charles C. Brooks | Movant | |
| Matthew Park | Movant | |
| David Hawkins | Movant | |
| Paul Elenio | Defendant | , , , |
| Ivan Kaufman | Defendant | , , , |
| Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | Defendant | , , , |
| Lois Martin | Plaintiff | , |
Docket entries showing 20 of https://www.courtlistener.com/api/rest/v4/docket-entries/?count=on&docket=68999532&page_size=40
#38 · 2026-05-05
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants; and Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 5/5/2026. (JP) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
#- · 2026-05-05
(no description on the docket)
#37 · 2026-03-31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in its entirety, and Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is dismissed. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend their Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order to plead, with the requisite specificity, the falsity of the alleged misstatements and Defendants' knowledge of that falsity. If Plaintiffs choose to amend their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs shall also submit a redline demonstrating changes between the current complaint and the new complaint. Absent amendment within 30 days, Read the filing
#- · 2025-03-03
ORDER: The parties' 29 proposed briefing schedule is So Ordered. Defendants shall serve their motion to dismiss by April 10, 2025; Plaintiffs shall serve their opposition on or before May 16, 2025; and Defendants shall serve their reply, if any, by June 16, 2025. As a courtesy to the Court, the parties are encouraged not to file their motion papers on ECF until the motion is fully briefed. If the parties follow this practice, the motion (or opposition) and all supporting papers are to be served on the other parties along with a cover letter setting forth whom the filer represents and the paper
#- · 2025-02-28
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of 27 Defendants' pre-motion conference ("PMC") request, and 28 Plaintiffs' response. Having reviewed the PMC request and Plaintiffs' response, the Court denies Defendants' PMC request as unnecessary. By March 7, 2025, the parties will submit a proposed joint briefing schedule for Defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court also notes that it cannot, as Plaintiffs request, deny "Defendants leave to file a motion to dismiss" and require them instead "to answer and proceed into the next phase of this litigation." (Dkt. 28 at 1.) See Eisemann v. Greene, 204 F.3d 393, 3
#36 · 2025-08-06
Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in civil action 2:25cv4373(SJB)(AYS) indicates this is a related case. (LJ) (Entered: 08/06/2025) Read the filing
#35 · 2025-06-16
Letter to the Hon. Pamela K. Chen from Andrew J. Levander dated June 16, 2025 re: Oral Argument on Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint by Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Paul Elenio, Ivan Kaufman (Levander, Andrew) (Entered: 06/16/2025)
#34 · 2025-06-16
REPLY in Support re 32 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Paul Elenio, Ivan Kaufman. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration (Supplemental) of Angela M. Liu in Support, # 2 Exhibit 14., # 3 Exhibit 15.) (Levander, Andrew) (Entered: 06/16/2025)
#33 · 2025-06-16
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 32 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint filed by David Hawkins, Lois Martin. (Apton, Adam) (Entered: 06/16/2025)
#32 · 2025-06-16
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint by Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Paul Elenio, Ivan Kaufman. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint, # 2 Declaration of Angela M. Liu in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint, # 3 Exhibit 1., # 4 Exhibit 2., # 5 Exhibit 3., # 6 Exhibit 4., # 7 Exhibit 5., # 8 Exhibit 6., # 9 Exhibit 7., # 10 Exhibit 8., # 11 Exhibit 9., # 12 Exhibit 10., # 13 Exhibit 11., # 14 Exhibit 12., # 15 Exhibit 13.) (Levander, Andrew) (Entered: 06/16/2025) Read the filing
#31 · 2025-05-16
Letter re Service of Opposition Brief by David Hawkins, Lois Martin (Apton, Adam) (Entered: 05/16/2025)
#30 · 2025-04-10
Letter re: service of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, Accompanying Memorandum of Law, Declaration of Angela M. Liu, and supporting Exhibits by Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Paul Elenio, Ivan Kaufman (Levander, Andrew) (Entered: 04/10/2025)
#- · 2025-03-03
(no description on the docket)
#29 · 2025-03-03
STIPULATION and Proposed Order Regarding Briefing Schedule (Jointly) by Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Paul Elenio, Ivan Kaufman (Levander, Andrew) (Entered: 03/03/2025)
#- · 2025-02-28
(no description on the docket)
#28 · 2025-02-27
Letter Response to Defendants' Request for Pre-Motion Conference 27 by David Hawkins, Lois Martin (Apton, Adam) (Entered: 02/27/2025)
#27 · 2025-02-20
Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Paul Elenio, Ivan Kaufman. (Levander, Andrew) (Entered: 02/20/2025)
#26 · 2025-01-21
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Paul Elenio, Ivan Kaufman, filed by David Hawkins, Lois Martin. (Apton, Adam) (Entered: 01/21/2025)
#- · 2024-12-18
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Lead Plaintiff Hawkins' 25 motion for an extension of time to file his amended complaint. That motion is granted with a slight modification. The amended complaint shall be due January 21, 2025 (as opposed to Lead Plaintiff Hawkins' proposed January 20, 2025 deadline, since the Court will be closed on that day in observance of Martin Luther King Jr. Day). Defendants' answer or pre-motion conference request shall be due February 20, 2025. The parties are reminded that pursuant to this Court's Individual Rule 1(F), all submissions must be filed by 5:00 p.m. (ET)
#- · 2024-11-07
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of 24 the parties' joint stipulation and proposed briefing schedule. The Court grants the parties' request for the amended complaint to be due January 6, 2025. The Court denies the parties' request to dispense with this Court's pre-motion conference requirement in favor of setting a briefing schedule for the motion to dismiss. (Dkt. 24 ¶¶ 2-5); see also Judge Pamela K. Chen Individual Practice & Rules 3(A). Defendants' answer or pre-motion conference request shall be due February 5, 2025. If Defendants elect to file a pre-motion conference request, Plaintiffs' re