Rejection of early termination addendum
Company: Applied Digital
What the later record shows
Not a promise: a reported event · happened July 29, 2024
The claim is a 2026 litigation averment about a past event: not accepting the Third Addendum proposed on July 29, 2024. It is not a forward commitment.
Checked October 9, 2026 against filings, releases and reporting published after the claim was made. Quotes are verbatim from the linked documents.
The claim, verbatim
Applied Digital did not accept or execute the Third Addendum proposed by Character Tech. on July 29, 2024, contending that the parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.
Source (primary)
Applied Digital Corporation v. Character Technologies, Inc. — Entry #38 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-09)Live source ↗
Quote: “Applied Digital avers that it neither accepted nor executed the Third Addendum because Applied Digital did not agree with the terms, arguing that the Parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.”
How we checked this
Checked on October 11, 2026. The cited source supports part of this claim, but not all of it.
The non-acceptance is Applied Digital's own averment. Character Tech. contends that Applied Digital never objected and that the addendum was binding.
Confirmed in the source:
- Character Tech. sent a proposed Third Addendum on July 29, 2024
- Applied Digital avers that it neither accepted nor executed the Third Addendum, arguing that the parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer
We could not confirm this from the cited source:
- That Applied Digital in fact did not accept the Third Addendum; Character Tech. alleges the Third Addendum was binding and that Applied Digital never objected to it
That does not mean it is false — only that this source does not establish it, as of the date above. If we find a source that settles it, we will re-check and update this page.
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.ded.90000/gov.uscourts.ded.90000.38.0.pdf) in full (48,875 characters, retrieved September 9, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Applied Digital Corporation v. Character Technologies, Inc. — Entry #38
Quote: “Applied Digital avers that it neither accepted nor executed the Third Addendum because Applied Digital did not agree with the terms, arguing that the Parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.”