jain.com

Rejection of early termination addendum

Company: Applied Digital

This claim was marked delayed on September 10, 2026. Recorded automatically from the cited source when it was published, then queued for evidence review.

How this was decided: Automated extraction from the cited source. The claim is preserved below exactly as it was originally published, so the record shows what was asserted as well as what became of it.

Subject kind
customer
Statement date
2026-09-09
Promised by
2024-07-29
Current status
delayed

The claim, verbatim

Applied Digital did not accept or execute the Third Addendum proposed by Character Tech. on July 29, 2024, contending that the parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.

Source (primary)

Docket 277 entry #38 - 1 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-09)Live source ↗

Quote: “Applied Digital avers that it neither accepted nor executed the Third Addendum because Applied Digital did not agree with the terms, arguing that the Parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.”

How we checked this

This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.

Additional evidence

confirms Docket 277 entry #38 - 1

Quote: “Applied Digital avers that it neither accepted nor executed the Third Addendum because Applied Digital did not agree with the terms, arguing that the Parties failed to accurately memorialize the offer.”

View cached copy (2026-09-09)Live source ↗

Record of changes

September 9, 2026 — stated
Automated extraction from the cited source. Recorded automatically from the cited source when it was published, then queued for evidence review.
September 10, 2026 — delayed
Automated extraction from the cited source. Recorded automatically from the cited source when it was published, then queued for evidence review.