Plaintiff failed to state libel and tortious interference claims
Company: Nebius
The claim, verbatim
The court held that Mosha failed to plead the elements of libel and tortious interference with contractual relations under Rule 12(b)(6).
Source (primary)
Mosha v. Yandex Inc. — Entry #43: OPINION AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss (refiling of docket no (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-12)Live source ↗
Quote: “Mosha has failed to state a claim for libel and tortious interference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and so the case must be dismissed.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Mosha v. Yandex Inc. — Entry #43: OPINION AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss (refiling of docket no
Quote: “Mosha has failed to state a claim for libel and tortious interference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and so the case must be dismissed.”