jain.com

Failure to state a claim

Company: Nebius

Subject kind
regulatory
Statement date
2019-10-30
Current status
verified

The claim, verbatim

The court held that Mosha failed to plead the elements of libel and tortious interference with contractual relations under Rule 12(b)(6).

Source (primary)

Mosha v. Yandex Inc. — Entry #50: AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER re: 45 MOTION to Amend/Correct Judgment Granting Motion To Dismiss (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-12)Live source ↗

Quote: “Mosha has failed to state a claim for libel and tortious interference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and so the case must be dismissed.”

How we checked this

This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.

Additional evidence

confirms Mosha v. Yandex Inc. — Entry #50: AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER re: 45 MOTION to Amend/Correct Judgment Granting Motion To Dismiss

Quote: “Mosha has failed to state a claim for libel and tortious interference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and so the case must be dismissed.”

View cached copy (2026-11-12)Live source ↗