Kishnani v. BB OpCo placed on inactive status
Company: Nebius
The claim, verbatim
The court placed the action on inactive status, ordered the parties to file a Rule 41 dismissal by May 7, 2025 or face dismissal, and vacated all other dates and deadlines.
Source (primary)
Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC — Entry #29: MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-09)Live source ↗
Quote: “this action is placed on inactive status. By May 7, 2025, the parties shall file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.”
How we checked this
Checked on November 10, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The minute order states each of these points directly.
Confirmed in the source:
- The court placed the action on inactive status
- The parties were ordered to file a Rule 41-compliant dismissal by May 7, 2025
- Failure to timely comply would result in dismissal of the action
- All other dates and deadlines were vacated
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cacd.947533/gov.uscourts.cacd.947533.29.0.pdf) in full (1,120 characters, retrieved November 9, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Kieren Kishnani v. BB OpCo, LLC — Entry #29: MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D
Quote: “this action is placed on inactive status. By May 7, 2025, the parties shall file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.”