jain.com

Strassman v. Theil derivative suit faces dismissal for want of prosecution

Company: Marathon Digital

Subject kind
other
Statement date
2024-04-16
Current status
verified

The claim, verbatim

The court clerk gave notice that the official record shows the case against Marathon Digital's CEO Fred Theil and others has been pending more than 270 days with no proceeding taken, and that the court will dismiss it for want of prosecution if no action is taken by May 16, 2024.

Source (primary)

Strassman v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. — Entry #36: NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-1 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-02)Live source ↗

Quote: “the official record in this action reflects that this case has been pending for more than 270 days without any proceeding having been taken during such period. If no action is taken in this case by 05/16/2024, the court shall enter an order of dismissal for want of prosecution.”

How we checked this

This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.

Additional evidence

confirms Strassman v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. — Entry #36: NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-1

Quote: “the official record in this action reflects that this case has been pending for more than 270 days without any proceeding having been taken during such period. If no action is taken in this case by 05/16/2024, the court shall enter an order of dismissal for want of prosecution.”

View cached copy (2026-11-02)Live source ↗