Strassman v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. — Entry #36: NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-1

Case: Strassman v. <mark>Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc</mark>. nvd · 2:22-cv-00724

filed May 05, 2022

What this document is

Docket entry #36 · filed April 16, 2024

NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-1. If no action is taken in this case within 30 days, the Court will enter an order of dismissal for want of prosecution. LR 41-1 dismissal deadline set for 5/16/2024. (HAM) (Entered: 04/16/2024)

Who is involved

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. [tracked: Marathon Digital]
Fred Theil
Georges Antoun
Jay Leupp
Kevin Denuccio
Merrick D. Okamoto
Roy Strassman
Said Ouissal
Sarita James
Simeon Salzman

Why we have it

We follow this case because a company we track is a party: Marathon Digital (listed as “Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.”). We checked the full party list on September 29, 2026 and confirmed the match.

A free copy from the RECAP archive of federal court filings (mirrored at the Internet Archive), retrieved November 02, 2026. Federal court filings are public records.

URL: https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nvd.156143/gov.uscourts.nvd.156143.36.0.pdf
Kind: court_filing
Publisher: RECAP
Published: 2024-04-16 00:00:00-04:00
Retrieved: 2026-11-02 06:52:41.060788-05:00
HTTP status: 200
MIME: application/pdf
Bytes: 17697
SHA-256: c2c2d7a64691475b81758c0cc9a40741003baae9734b4380e29602d05d829326

Document text

1 page(s), 1,397 characters, converted from the PDF's text layer · plain text.

Full text

Case 2:22-cv-00724-RFB-NJK        Document 36      Filed 04/16/24    Page 1 of 1


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                  DISTRICT OF NEVADA


ROY STRASSMAN,
                                                        2:22−cv−00724−RFB−NJK
                 Plaintiff(s),
vs.
FRED THEIL, et al.,
                                                        April 16, 2024
                Defendant(s).


       NOTICE REGARDING INTENT TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
                      PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41−1
To: Roy Strassman
Local Rule 41-1 provides as follows:
      "All civil actions that have been pending in this court for more than 270 days
      without any proceeding of record having been taken may, after notice, be dismissed
      for want of prosecution by the court sua sponte or on the motion of an attorney or
      pro se party."
      Be advised the official record in this action reflects that this case has been pending for
more than 270 days without any proceeding having been taken during such period.
      If no action is taken in this case by 05/16/2024, the court shall enter an order of dismissal
for want of prosecution.
                                         DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK


                                         By: /s/ Heather A Magennis
                                               Deputy Clerk