jain.com

Regulation of MARA would pass to the new city, not the county

Company: Marathon Digital

Subject kind
regulatory
Statement date
2025-10-30
Current status
stated

The claim, verbatim

Defendants argue that any regulatory power over MARA arising from the incorporation of Mitchell Bend would belong to the newly incorporated city rather than the County, so the County's acts could not have deprived MARA of any rights.

Source (primary)

<mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #11 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-01)Live source ↗

Quote: “Any regulation that would result from the incorporation of Mitchell Bend would rest with the newly incorporated city, not the County.”

How we checked this

This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.

Additional evidence

confirms <mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #11

Quote: “Any regulation that would result from the incorporation of Mitchell Bend would rest with the newly incorporated city, not the County.”

View cached copy (2026-11-01)Live source ↗