Defendants assert sovereign immunity and lack of jurisdiction
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Defendants contend the federal court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction and that venue is improper because of sovereign immunity, and that no statutory waiver of governmental immunity permits injunctive or mandamus relief.
Source (primary)
<mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #11 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-11-01)Live source ↗
Quote: “Defendants generally denies that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction and that venue is proper based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms <mark>MARA Holdings, Inc</mark>. v. Hood County, Texas — Entry #11
Quote: “Defendants generally denies that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction and that venue is proper based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity.”