Scope of Lancium patent litigation: seven patents
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
The parties described the litigation as involving seven patents. They said they expect early motion practice and claim construction alone to impose substantial burden and expense.
Source (primary)
Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #17: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Stay all Other Deadlines by Lancium LLC (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-16)Live source ↗
Quote: “Given the scope of this litigation, which involves seven (7) patents, the Parties expect that early motion practice and claim construction proceedings alone will result in a substantial imposition upon the Court and significant expenditure by the Parties.”
How we checked this
Checked on October 17, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
Paragraph 4 of the joint motion states the case involves seven patents and that early motion practice and claim construction alone would substantially burden the Court and cost the parties significantly.
Confirmed in the source:
- The parties described the litigation as involving seven patents
- The parties expect early motion practice and claim construction proceedings alone to impose a substantial burden on the Court and significant expense on the parties
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597.17.0.pdf) in full (4,828 characters, retrieved October 16, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #17: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Stay all Other Deadlines by Lancium LLC
Quote: “Given the scope of this litigation, which involves seven (7) patents, the Parties expect that early motion practice and claim construction proceedings alone will result in a substantial imposition upon the Court and significant expenditure by the Parties.”