Lancium patent suit against US Bitcoin entities: settlement talks unresolved
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
In a joint motion, the parties said they kept negotiating during the stay but had not reached a final resolution of the patent dispute.
Source (primary)
Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #17: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Stay all Other Deadlines by Lancium LLC (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-16)Live source ↗
Quote: “During the stay period, the Parties engaged in continued negotiations but have not yet been able to reach final resolution.”
How we checked this
Checked on October 17, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The joint motion states the parties kept negotiating during the stay without reaching final resolution, and it describes the case as involving seven patents.
Confirmed in the source:
- The statement was made in a joint motion by the parties
- The parties continued negotiating during the stay period
- The parties had not yet reached a final resolution
- The dispute is a patent dispute
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597.17.0.pdf) in full (4,828 characters, retrieved October 16, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #17: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Stay all Other Deadlines by Lancium LLC
Quote: “During the stay period, the Parties engaged in continued negotiations but have not yet been able to reach final resolution.”