Defendants had not answered the complaint
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Lancium states that none of the defendants had answered or filed a motion for summary judgment at the time of dismissal.
Source (primary)
Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #19: NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lancium LLC (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-16)Live source ↗
Quote: “None of the Defendants have answered or filed a motion for summary judgment.”
How we checked this
Checked on October 17, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The notice states this directly as the basis for dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
Confirmed in the source:
- Lancium states that none of the defendants had answered or filed a motion for summary judgment at the time of the dismissal.
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597.19.0.pdf) in full (2,668 characters, retrieved October 16, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #19: NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lancium LLC
Quote: “None of the Defendants have answered or filed a motion for summary judgment.”