Ongoing settlement negotiations between Lancium and US Bitcoin entities
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
Lancium asserts it has been negotiating in good faith with the defendants since first requesting a stay, that negotiations were delayed by conditions affecting the defendants, that they have not concluded, and that the parties continue negotiating a final resolution.
Source (primary)
Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #19: NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lancium LLC (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-16)Live source ↗
Quote: “the timing of these negotiations have been impacted by conditions affecting Defendants and outside of Plaintiff’s control and have not yet reached conclusion”
How we checked this
Checked on October 17, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The notice states each of these points as Lancium's own account of the negotiations.
Confirmed in the source:
- Lancium states it has been in good faith negotiations with the defendants since first requesting a stay.
- Lancium states the timing of the negotiations was affected by conditions affecting the defendants and outside Lancium's control.
- Lancium states the negotiations had not yet concluded.
- Lancium states the parties continue negotiating a final resolution of their dispute.
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597.19.0.pdf) in full (2,668 characters, retrieved October 16, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #19: NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lancium LLC
Quote: “the timing of these negotiations have been impacted by conditions affecting Defendants and outside of Plaintiff’s control and have not yet reached conclusion”