Lancium v. US Bitcoin patent suit dismissed
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
The court dismissed without prejudice all claims by Lancium LLC against U.S. Data Mining Group (US Bitcoin), U.S. Mining Infrastructure Operations, and U.S. Data King Mountain LLC, following Lancium's notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a), and closed the case.
Source (primary)
Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #20: ORDER DISMISSING CASE (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-16)Live source ↗
Quote: “the Court ORDERS that all claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice”
How we checked this
Checked on October 17, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The January 16, 2024 order dismisses all claims against all three named defendants without prejudice under Rule 41(a), following Lancium's notice of voluntary dismissal, and closes the case. The order itself does not say what kind of suit this was, so the 'patent suit' label in the heading is not established by this document.
Confirmed in the source:
- The court considered Lancium LLC's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice
- The dismissal was ordered pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- All claims against all defendants were dismissed without prejudice
- The defendants were U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. d/b/a US Bitcoin, U.S. Mining Infrastructure Operations, LLC, and U.S. Data King Mountain LLC
- The court directed the Clerk to close the case
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597/gov.uscourts.txwd.1218597.20.0.pdf) in full (830 characters, retrieved October 16, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Lancium LLC v. U.S. Data Mining Group, Inc. — Entry #20: ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Quote: “the Court ORDERS that all claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice”