jain.com

Wolf Hollow nuisance suit remanded to state court

Company: Marathon Digital

Subject kind
regulatory
Statement date
2025-03-28
Current status
verified

The claim, verbatim

The federal court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation, overruled MARA's objections, granted plaintiff's motion to remand, held it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, and remanded the case to the 335th Judicial District Court of Hood County, Texas.

Source (primary)

Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — Entry #37: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court determines that the Findings, Conclusions, and… (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-15)Live source ↗

Quote: “it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED; this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction; and the case is REMANDED to the 335th Judicial District Court of Hood County, Texas.”

How we checked this

Checked on October 16, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.

The order states each of these outcomes, in its opening and in its conclusion.

Confirmed in the source:

What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.395717/gov.uscourts.txnd.395717.37.0.pdf) in full (8,903 characters, retrieved October 15, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.

Additional evidence

confirms Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow v. Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — Entry #37: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court determines that the Findings, Conclusions, and…

Quote: “it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED; this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction; and the case is REMANDED to the 335th Judicial District Court of Hood County, Texas.”

View cached copy (2026-10-15)Live source ↗