jain.com

Defendant LLC linked to Hut 8 counsel allegedly failed to answer complaint

Company: Hut 8

Subject kind
other
Statement date
2025-12-04
Current status
stated

The claim, verbatim

Plaintiff alleges the defendant LLC was served October 27, 2025, its answer was due by November 17, 2025, and it has failed to answer or otherwise respond, so plaintiff requests a clerk's entry of default.

Source (primary)

Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc v. Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY LLC — Entry #11: Request for Clerk to issue Entry of Default filed by Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-10-12)Live source ↗

Quote: “To date, Defendant has failed to file an answer or other responsive pleading within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i).”

How we checked this

Checked on October 15, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.

The filing is the plaintiff's request for a clerk's entry of default. It is supported by a declaration that gives the October 27, 2025 service date and the November 17, 2025 answer deadline, and states that the defendant has not responded.

Confirmed in the source:

What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txnd.410141/gov.uscourts.txnd.410141.11.0.pdf) in full (4,337 characters, retrieved October 12, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.

Additional evidence

confirms Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc v. Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurant of CNY LLC — Entry #11: Request for Clerk to issue Entry of Default filed by Spaghetti Warehouse Restaurants Inc

Quote: “To date, Defendant has failed to file an answer or other responsive pleading within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i).”

View cached copy (2026-10-12)Live source ↗