Proposed dismissal with prejudice of BCB Cheyenne v. MineOne

Checked on October 12, 2026. The cited source supports part of this claim, but not all of it.

The filing shows an unsigned, undated order dismissing the complaint and counterclaims with prejudice, each side bearing its own costs and fees. The text itself does not say it is a proposed order or that the parties submitted it, though the blanks suggest this.

Confirmed in the source:

• The order in this filing is unsigned, with a blank judge's signature line
• The order is undated, leaving the day of October 2024 blank
• The order's terms dismiss the First Amended Complaint and the listed defendants' counterclaims with prejudice
• Under the order's terms, each party pays its own costs and attorney's fees

We could not confirm this from the cited source:

• The document does not label itself a proposed order or state that the parties submitted it

That does not mean it is false — only that this source does not establish it, as of the date above. If we find a source that settles it, we will re-check and update this page.

What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.wyd.63456/gov.uscourts.wyd.63456.387.1.pdf) in full (1,825 characters, retrieved October 5, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.

confirms BCB Cheyenne LLC v. MineOne Wyoming Data Center LLC — Entry #387: Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff BCB Cheyenne LLC

Quote: “Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and the Counterclaims of MineOne Wyoming Data Center LLC, Terra Crypto Inc., MineOne Partners LLC, Bit Origin, Ltd. and SonicHash LLC should be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice, with each Party to pay its own costs and attorney’s fees”

View cached copy (2026-10-05)Live source ↗