MineOne contends prejudgment writs were improper
Company: CleanSpark
The claim, verbatim
MineOne Wyoming Data Center LLC contends the district court improperly granted the prejudgment writs against it, and that the order is appealable because it is an interlocutory order of serious, irreparable consequence that can only be effectively challenged by immediate appeal.
Source (primary)
BCB Cheyenne v. MineOne Wyoming Data Center — Entry #2 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-29)Live source ↗
Quote: “The result below which is being appealed is the Court's improper granting of prejudgment writs against Defendant MineOne Wyoming Data Center LLC.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms BCB Cheyenne v. MineOne Wyoming Data Center — Entry #2
Quote: “The result below which is being appealed is the Court's improper granting of prejudgment writs against Defendant MineOne Wyoming Data Center LLC.”