Mawson v. CleanSpark: consequential damages claim dismissed (as cited by Iconix)
Company: CleanSpark
The claim, verbatim
In a reply brief in an unrelated case (Cole v. Iconix), defendant Iconix cites Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. v. CleanSpark, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2025) as a decision granting a motion to dismiss a consequential damages claim. This is Iconix's characterization of that ruling, not a finding by the court in this case.
Source (primary)
Cole v. Iconix International Inc. — Entry #37 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “Mawson Infrastructure Grp., Inc. v. CleanSpark, Inc., 2025 WL 2636305, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2025) (granting motion to dismiss consequential damages)”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Cole v. Iconix International Inc. — Entry #37
Quote: “Mawson Infrastructure Grp., Inc. v. CleanSpark, Inc., 2025 WL 2636305, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2025) (granting motion to dismiss consequential damages)”