No objections and no valid exclusions to Stronghold settlement
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
The claims administrator declared that it received one exclusion request since its initial declaration, which it deemed invalid, and that it had not received or been notified of any objections to the settlement by the March 21, 2025 deadline.
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “SCS has received one request for exclusion. Upon review, it was determined that the request was invalid ... SCS has not received any misdirected objections, nor has SCS been notified that any objections were filed.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval
Quote: “SCS has received one request for exclusion. Upon review, it was determined that the request was invalid ... SCS has not received any misdirected objections, nor has SCS been notified that any objections were filed.”