Related Stronghold derivative litigation carved out
Company: TeraWulf
The claim, verbatim
The proposed judgment would preserve claims by derivative plaintiffs in In re Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, No. 1:23-cv-07840-RA (S.D.N.Y.).
Source (primary)
Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “nothing in this Judgment shall bar any action by ... any derivative plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned In re Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 1 :23-cv-07840-RA (S.D.N.Y).”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Winter v. Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. — Entry #132: REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION for Settlement Final Approval
Quote: “nothing in this Judgment shall bar any action by ... any derivative plaintiff in the lawsuit captioned In re Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 1 :23-cv-07840-RA (S.D.N.Y).”