Parties propose consolidating and staying the derivative suits
Company: Hut 8
The claim, verbatim
The plaintiffs and defendants jointly asked the court to take several steps: consolidate the two derivative actions into In re Hut 8 Corp. Stockholder Derivative Litigation (No. 1:24-cv-02995), appoint Lifshitz Law and Portnoy Law as co-lead counsel, and stay the case. The stay would last until the securities class action is dismissed with prejudice (after appeals), the motion to dismiss is denied, or either side gives 10 days' notice. The order is proposed and unsigned, not yet entered by the court.
Source (primary)
Ubhi v. Leverton — Entry #5: PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree, stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court enter an order as follows ... The above-captioned actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes into Case No. 1:24-cv-02995”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Ubhi v. Leverton — Entry #5: PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER
Quote: “the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree, stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court enter an order as follows ... The above-captioned actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes into Case No. 1:24-cv-02995”