Order to show cause re transfer to S.D. Florida
Company: Hut 8
The claim, verbatim
Judge Analisa Torres ordered the plaintiff to show cause in writing by June 24, 2024 why the derivative action should not be transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the Southern District of Florida, where Hut 8's principal place of business is located, and stated the case will be transferred if the plaintiff fails to respond or show venue is proper.
Source (primary)
Ubhi v. Leverton — Entry #6: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, the Court is inclined to transfer this case under 28 U.S.C (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “the Court is inclined to transfer this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Hut 8’s principal place of business is located. ... By June 24, 2024, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be transferred.”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Ubhi v. Leverton — Entry #6: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, the Court is inclined to transfer this case under 28 U.S.C
Quote: “the Court is inclined to transfer this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Hut 8’s principal place of business is located. ... By June 24, 2024, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be transferred.”