Plaintiff's venue allegation for S.D.N.Y.
Company: Hut 8
The claim, verbatim
The complaint alleges venue is proper in the Southern District of New York because a substantial portion of the alleged wrongs occurred there and defendants received substantial compensation doing business there.
Source (primary)
Ubhi v. Leverton — Entry #6: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, the Court is inclined to transfer this case under 28 U.S.C (RECAP (purchased via PACER), court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-28)Live source ↗
Quote: “because a substantial portion of the transactions and wrongs complained of herein occurred in this District and [D]efendants have received substantial compensation within this District”
How we checked this
This claim has not yet been checked assertion-by-assertion against its source. It carries a cited source and quote, but the deeper check has not run. When it does, the result appears here whatever it says.
Additional evidence
confirms Ubhi v. Leverton — Entry #6: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, the Court is inclined to transfer this case under 28 U.S.C
Quote: “because a substantial portion of the transactions and wrongs complained of herein occurred in this District and [D]efendants have received substantial compensation within this District”