Patent Office grants reexamination petitions and finds substantial new questions of patentability
Company: Marathon Digital
The claim, verbatim
The Patent Office granted MARA's petitions for ex parte reexaminations on all six patents-in-suit, finding that each petition raised a substantial new question of patentability
Source (primary)
Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) — Entry #93 (RECAP, court_filing)
View cached copy (2026-09-27)Live source ↗
Quote: “the Patent Office granted each of those petitions, finding that each petition raised a substantial new question of patentability”
How we checked this
Checked on September 29, 2026. The cited source supports every part of this claim.
The filing states that the Patent Office granted all six petitions and found that each raised a substantial new question of patentability, citing Dkt. 79.
Confirmed in the source:
- The Patent Office granted each of MARA's ex parte reexamination petitions on the six patents-in-suit
- The Patent Office found that each petition raised a substantial new question of patentability
What we did: Read our cached copy of RECAP (https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172841950/gov.uscourts.txwd.1172841950.93.0.pdf) in full (2,941 characters, retrieved September 27, 2026) and checked each assertion in the claim against it.
Additional evidence
confirms Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. MARA Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) — Entry #93
Quote: “the Patent Office granted each of those petitions, finding that each petition raised a substantial new question of patentability”